Home | Features | Articles | Humour | Election Fever - 2010

Election Fever - 2010

By

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
Election Fever - 2010

On the last day before the General Election we bring you this report on the "other runners" who may help to form a Government should there be a hung Parliament.



The election campaign is well under way and it seems like it’s still all to play for. The major political parties of the UK are locked in a monster battle to decide who will govern the country and all will be decided on May 6th – or will it? The Swing-o-Meter needs several new pointers, and the odds are shortening on a hung parliament, where no single party holds an overall majority. Already, some of the minor parties are being wooed by the ‘big three’ but what’s in it for us? Which of the minor parties hold important views on angling.

Swing-o-Meter

The Real United Kingdom Independence Party (RUKIP): - Their main thrust is to sever all ties with Europe. However, an in depth study of their manifesto reveals some startling policies. To bring down the terrible deficit we are facing they are proposing to sell off The Falkland Islands to Argentina, Gibraltar to the Spanish and in a rather radical proposal, Cornwall to the French!

To further their ideals of a nation bathed in nostalgia they have taken a leaf out of the much-loved Test Match Special in proposing compulsory coverage of fishing matches on the radio. Carp Match Special (CMS), exploring the, as yet, untapped potential of radio media for gripping the nation with a cast by cast coverage of fishing matches. If successful, the commentary teams are being put together including Matt Hayes and Keith Arthur, with summaries by Bob Nudd MBE.


The Alternative British National Party (ABNP)
: - This far right political party is proposing repatriation of all non-native species of fish. When it was pointed out that this meant that this would mean the exclusion of Rainbow Trout, Catfish, Common Carp; Orfe; Zander and barring migratory Salmon and Eels the Party leader said he wasn’t against the fish personally but that the waterways of Britain were full and they would have to go to make room for British fish. Hybrids are in for even worse treatment!

BANNED in future!
As far as baits are concerned the ABNP will enforce a strict whites only policy on maggots. Their view on segregation means no longer will you pop down the tackle shop for a pint of mixed! If you don’t like it keep it to yourself if you don’t want some skinheads wearing ‘Love Britain or F*** Off’ T-shirts jack-booting down your street!


The Other Green Party: - To cope with the extraordinary financial situation and in an effort to keep anglers off the banks they will advise a ‘carbon’ tax on carbon fibre rods to encourage a move to a sustainable split cane or carbon neutral glass fibre rod economy. Average tax on a 12 foot barbel rod will be £35 whilst a 14 metre pole will be an extortionate £155. Ground-baiting and loose feeding will be criminalised as polluting water courses.


The Climate Change Party: - The CCP Hold the opposing view that the use of carbon fibre rods could be the salvation of the planet! The excess carbon in our atmosphere would be sequestered in fishing rods. The rods will be compulsory, and grant aided, in fact a day’s fishing with two carbon fibre rods would be the equivalent of taking three thousand cars off the road.(Source: Statistics are Us – Statistics to suit all occasions). Anglers fishing with five or more carbon rods at a time could be eligible for tax rebates.


New British Communist Party: - If this lot have the casting vote they will demand that government Nationalise all land, rivers and lakes. Angling will become ‘The Opium of the People’. They also promise to organise revolution to free the working classes from the capitalist bourgeois ruling class.


100504Rosettes_602951190.jpgDeath, Dungeons and Taxes Party: - The party's manifesto advocates reducing the school leaving age to nine, the annexation of France, and the reintroduction of hanging, but only for "minor offences" such as littering. By contrast, murderers would be disembowelled, along with improper users of text language. The proposed rate of tax was 90%. Immigrants would be repelled with boiling oil and longbows at all ports and airports.


The Fancy Dress Party: - A rather frivolous party in the mould of The Monster Raving Loony Party. Their ingenious policy is to use a smaller font size to automatically reduce the unemployment statistics.


The Sensible Party: - Features the major commitment of their long held pledge to abolish income tax, citing as always that it was only meant to be a temporary measure during the Napoleonic Wars. Furthermore, any MP whose constituency sells off a school playing field for development will be required to relinquish their own back garden as a replacement sports facility for the school. In addition, my own favourite, the introduction of a 99p coin to "save on change".


Traditional Angling Party (TAP): - Believe in only permitting cane or split cane rods and monofilament line. The production and selling of bait to be banned, the angler only using what they can find on the bank, or what they can tie from fur and feathers.


Extreme Traditional Angling Party (ETAP): – Apart from ‘Angler Only’ shortlists for their candidate choice they intend to enforce the use of homemade rods from willow branches, plaited horsehair lines; gut hook links and wire hooks.


Fogeys Against Radical Tackle (FART): - A load of old windbags moaning on about how good it was in my day. Could have strong support from the ‘Grey’ vote.


100504YogicFlying_425244690.gifNatural Law Party thinking of making a comeback stating that Yogic flying could solve the defence budget. A dedicated team of yogic flyers would form an invincible barrier against all enemies; the savings could be huge. For carp anglers transcendental meditation techniques could make those bite-less hours pass in an instant.

Andy Scholey and Kevin Perkins

(Warning to all guests and newcomers to FishingMagic, THIS IS A SPOOF! Just in case you thought it was for real.)

 







By the Same Author



Rate this article

4.67




Comments (28 posted):

ED (The ORIGINAL and REAL one) on 04/05/2010 23:29:42
avatar
OOOOOPS !!! ---I misread the title .... I thought it said ERECTION FEVER !!!
Cliff Hatton 2 on 05/05/2010 20:32:16
avatar
I'm both shocked and extremely disappointed that this excellent site has allowed itself to be used for propaganda purposes. Spoof? Oh, no it's not. I shall be making a complaint to our moderators in the hope that this piece of drivel is taken off.
peter crabtree on 05/05/2010 21:33:38
avatar
Whats all this fuss about the result tomorrow? X-factor doesn't finish for weeks yet....................
Wobbly Face (As Per Ed) on 05/05/2010 21:54:13
avatar
I thought FM had a policy of "NO POLITICS". You forgot the FAB party, party For Artificial baits. Looking for realistic and simplistic policies to fool everyone. Cure the world food shortage. No need for agricultural land. McDonalds will be able to sell plastic burgers, they are made from carpets at the moment.
ED (The ORIGINAL and REAL one) on 05/05/2010 22:04:50
avatar
I'm both shocked and extremely disappointed that this excellent site has allowed itself to be used for propaganda purposes. Spoof? Oh, no it's not. I shall be making a complaint to our moderators in the hope that this piece of drivel is taken off. Are you being serious ???
Steve Spiller on 05/05/2010 22:17:30
avatar
Was wondering the same too Ed? It's a pi$$ take, nothing more..... Are you serious Cliff?
ED (The ORIGINAL and REAL one) on 05/05/2010 22:45:58
avatar
Yes, I'm serious, and a little concerned that crude collocations like that of maggots with ANY legitimate political belief is, apparently, undetected by so many. Propaganda can be very subtle - very subtle indeed, and it works. But none of the parties mentioned in the spoof article actually exist .......
Steve Spiller on 05/05/2010 23:05:22
avatar
Hehehehe ;) Don't say that mate, I'm gonna get one soon... But you're right mate.
Lee Swords on 05/05/2010 23:06:06
avatar
hahaha!!! And i thought politics was banned :O)
Steve Spiller on 05/05/2010 23:09:07
avatar
Just a rant Lee ;) Anyway, it's me birfday now, time for a beer :D
ED (The ORIGINAL and REAL one) on 05/05/2010 23:29:42
avatar
>..........................................................
Neil Maidment on 05/05/2010 23:30:52
avatar
Gentlemen, gentlemen.... this thread is about the hilarious (at least I think so) article, not real politics. I haven't got time to send you all PMs explaining my decision to delete/edit so you'll have to make do with this. Its a good article, give it credit for what it is! Ta ever so!
Steve Spiller on 05/05/2010 23:32:38
avatar
We've been modded, sorry Neil. Oh well, you all know how I feel...........
ED (The ORIGINAL and REAL one) on 05/05/2010 23:34:14
avatar
Seeing your post was deleted Cliff Re air injected freelined lobs ..... Make sure you hook them properly or they'll fly off the hook --a little square of elastic band hooked just past the barb will hold them on ......:wh And my Birthday greetings to you Steve were also deleted (I don't know why!) And Congrats to you Neil for your new PB Trout !! What a belter ..............
Neil Maidment on 05/05/2010 23:34:38
avatar
Happy Birthday! :w:D
Fred Bonney on 06/05/2010 06:24:29
avatar
I'm was just wondering how Cliff got quoted but no sign of his post??, then I read page 2:( Hope you're sober Steve, happy borthday mate.
Jeff Woodhouse on 06/05/2010 08:39:16
avatar
Well, I have to say that I am most surprised at Cliff's outburst and even sorrier that his post has been deleted. Without mentioning political parties, I would have thought that one of Cliff's primary concerns was for the free publication of literature, free of political interference and censorship, that is. Of course we have overwhelming laws now preventing us from mentionign a whole range of topics, but political satire is still intouched by these, I believe. Otherwise, how would Bremner, Bird and Fortune get away with their stuff, some of which I have participated in - [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-5VzvkMs5I]YouTube - Bremner, Bird and Fortune: Sir Alan Sugar[/ame] Crikey, when I was a member of the SDP (that's no longer political, it's history - and another joke) we got no end of jibes from the other parties, cartoonists, comedians, writers, journalists, broadcasters and every man and his dog. Trouble was, they were being serious and named the actual party. But, I will ask Cliff first here and now and if he is still of the same opinion, I will delete the article - Cliff, do you really want me to censor this article?
geoffmaynard on 06/05/2010 08:48:04
avatar
Check your email Jeff
Graham Whatmore on 06/05/2010 09:45:28
avatar
Oh! my gawd I've seen it all now, our very own Kevin Perkins being accused of being political over what is a very humourous article, why do sleeves and up come to mind? Me, I am definitely voting for the FART party, who else would an old fart vote for? How do they go about canvassing though, do they hobble round potential voters on their zimmers or have they adapted some powerwalkers to make them power-riders?
Kevin Perkins on 06/05/2010 10:15:44
avatar
I should just point out that the article is 99.9% Andy Scholey's, my input was minimal, to say the least. That said, i thought it was as good, if not better than anything I would have written, it's as tongue in cheek as it gets, and if we can't take the p*ss every now and then, (God knows some of the politicians deserve it) we should all give up right now.
ED (The ORIGINAL and REAL one) on 06/05/2010 11:01:23
avatar
I should just point out that the article is 99.9% Andy Scholey's, my input was minimal, to say the least. That said, i thought it was as good, if not better than anything I would have written, it's as tongue in cheek as it gets, and if we can't take the p*ss every now and then, (God knows some of the politicians deserve it) we should all give up right now. Take no notice Kevin ---it's just ONE person who can't take a joke.....
john m h on 06/05/2010 13:24:47
avatar
[LEFT]"I was a member of the SDP (that's no longer political, it's history - and another joke) we got no end of jibes from the other parties", like... He has absolutely no interest in politics so he joined the SDP :D :D A dirty game politics; A few weeks back my wife was helping out at the local HQ of the party she is a member of when a reporter from the Northern Echo came in to interview the candidate. Apparently someone from the candidate for squeaky clean party's office had left a message on the too posh to rule party's answerphone asking whether they could work together in trying to dig-dirt on the peoples party candidate. Not only do politicians need not have any morals these days but also have to be very very stupid. And I bet not many know that Tony Blair wasn't even short-listed for the Sedgefield seat the first time round. He couldn't be bothered to attend the first selection meeting and only provided an A4 leaflet to support his application. Frantic phone calls over the next weekend between the Chairman of the Constituency Party ( a chap called Mick Terrance - now deceased) and Michael Foots office saw another name being added to the short-list and, as the saying goes the rest is now history. But for that bu$$er TB my wife might well have become PM, now that is an awesome thought.[/LEFT]
Cliff Hatton 2 on 06/05/2010 19:17:37
avatar
Well, Jeff...I DID have a couple of very comprehensive replies on here but they were deleted!
Jeff Woodhouse on 06/05/2010 21:12:04
avatar
I DID have a couple of very comprehensive replies on here but they were deleted! Yes, because the moderator (not I) felt that you were making real political points. Doesn't matter now, the polls have closed. Much of what you said, and I can still access it, I would agree with absolutely. But at one point you made the statement in criticism of this Governement "... created the nearest thing we've ever had to The Thought Police through the tyranny of political correctness.." So, one of the things you object to is control over what is said, what is thought, what is published; am I correct? Yet, you would like us to censor something that was created as a bit of fun, with no real maliciousness behind it (least I doubt it knowing Andy and Kevin). A lot of the time I find myself biting my tongue, holding back on the keyboard, because of what you say and that I agree with, we cannot express ourselves as freely as we would like. But then you want to do the same as the government and censor what someone else would call satire. I find those two actions incompatible, don't you Cliff? I am trying to be serious here and I don't mind it opening up into a debate. I think you'll find an awfull lot of support on this forum for your comments (maybe not for the party you mentioned) in general, but to then try and suppress free thinking and a satirical political comment, well, I don't know where that leaves us. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Steve King on 06/05/2010 23:57:18
avatar
May have been done, but anyway: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31FFTx6AKmU"]Silyl_Party[/ame] ---------- Post added at 00:57 ---------- Previous post was at 00:07 ---------- Joking apart fellas (and I don't take politics that seriously!") there seem to have been some serious ****ups with number of ballot papers and the capacity of some polling stations! With the possibility of a potential hung parliament. I would have expected better preparations - it is not acceptable that votes have to be turned away!! The technology for a computerised system exists - we just need to issue the voting card!!
Graham Whatmore on 07/05/2010 08:16:51
avatar
As we aren't allowed to comment on the current fiasco concerning our country I shall refrain from groaning at the thought that we have to go through the whole damn fiasco yet again. :mad::mad::mad: Is Tyburn still functional? Will tickets be on sale shortly?
john m h on 07/05/2010 08:40:34
avatar
[LEFT]It would seem that the jobs at polling stations are 'jobs for the boys' (and girls) On my ward ever since I can remember it's been the same old faces, mostly council workers (and wife's/husbands) It also extends to the guys who used to walk the streets putting out the electoral registration forms, and the same people have the job of chasing up those that were not returned. It also seems to be a job that they take with them into retirement, some with hands now so shaky they have a problem in handing the ballot papers over to voters. I'm in no way anti local authority workers, or ageist, as my son is a group accountant with a LA, but please lets have people who are up to such an important job. I wouldn't have said it was time for a change in Government, but it's definitely time for a change in how we vote. Thankfully the Lib Dems 'dirty tricks' campaign in my constituency failed ... once again. From Woody's quote "... created the nearest thing we've ever had to The Thought Police through the tyranny of political correctness.." The $loody BS, they get everywhere :)[/LEFT]
Cliff Hatton 2 on 07/05/2010 16:51:19
avatar
Before I launch into my reply to Woody's comment it is vital that our common bond as Brothers of the Angle is recognised as being every bit as important as any other consideration; if politics were not a reality, or the subject never reared its ugly head, we'd all be no wiser and very happy to be followers of the most wonderful pastime: you'd net my carp and I'd unhook your pike...we'd share a brew, have a laugh and drop in for a pint or two on the way home, happy as Larry. Unfortunately we're not always wader-clad and clumping about within a fug of Monster Crab and ageing casters! We're also 'citizens' (not technically, I know, but you get my drift...) and as such we have opinions - opinions which are largely based on our position in life and our view of politicians (sorry to appear to preach but I'm keen to maintain the 'angler's bond') My objection to the article is borne of a sense of fair play and justice - not for any particular love of this or that party. The three 'big' parties which have ruled the roost seemingly since time began have recently exposed themselves as (alleged) crooks, swindlers, tax-evaders, penny-pinchers and twisters. The country was incandescent with rage was it not? For weeks on end we watched these scoundrels squirming and attempting to lie their way out of indefensible predicaments. Together - for parliament and democracy (ha!) depend on opposition as much as government - the 'Big 3' have subverted the nation's values, its demographic, its character, its humour, its freedom and - yes - the way we think. 'Thought Police' is NOT too strong a word to describe the deliberately imposed tyranny of political correctness: thousands and thousands of people have lost their jobs or have been disciplined for voicing perfectly reasonable opinions and even certain WORDS which do not fit within the ideology of the present establishment. Now, does anybody see any real distinction between the main parties nowadays? No. There is none. There is, effectively, ONE party and that party has been conditioning us for 13 years to keep silent. Throughout this time, a party called the British National Party has been trying to voice its opposition to the Labour, Liberal and Conservative parties. Whenever it has tried, the full force of the media - and the BBC in particular - has mobilized to silence them; not through debate or fair and open opposition but through the kind of flagrant, crude propaganda exemplified by this article. Honest...I really did believe the public had wised-up to this sort of stuff. As much as Woody might think - or have us believe - otherwise, the author of this piece WAS attempting to influence voting intentions ON THE EVE OF A GENERAL ELECTION, or his judgement in falling back on the tired, insulting brand of political 'humour' was sorely wanting. Analogies with 'maggots' (and that shot of the maggots must have been carefully selected - they're the vilest looking maggots I've ever seen) and references to 'skinhead thugs' 'knuckle-dragging' ad nauseum are unoriginal, base, crude and insulting in the extreme to a great many people who have perceived a welcome change in the make-up of that party. If a political view is constantly and relentlessly vilified through dirty tricks rather than through rational, reasonable debate then dictatorship looms - indeed, EXISTS. Does anyone here consider the Marmite campaign reasonable? Does anyone here consider the barring from this country of the democratically-elected and eminently decent Geert Wilders a good thing? If you do, then you also think it right and proper that Lord Ahmed threatened to - and I quote - 'have Parliament surrounded by ten thousand muslims within the hour'. Does anyone think it right that a guy (whose name escapes me) should be near-bludgeoned to death with a hammer for attending a meeting of his chosen political party? I'll continue...Does anyone here think it right that, say, William Hague is interviewed by Paxo against a back-drop of sky-blue and corn-fields while Nick Griffin gets a nice abstract piece suggestive of blood and gloom? This is what they do! It's all insidious, subliminal stuff which slowly but surely links the public psyche with things that are BAD...EVIL...WICKED. No, Jeff, I do not want you to censor anything. I'd like you to keep this article for all to see and, maybe, for them to print-off for future perusal when - as the maggots-caption encourages - the British National Party IS banned. That would be one sad day for democracy (ha!) would it not? I have voted Labour all my life. I was even a founder member of my local party some 20 years ago. When Blair was elected I cheered myself hoarse with joy...Thirteen years on I see a wrecked nation, aided and abetted by Amnesty Clegg and the schoolboy, Cameron. Note that I have not compared them with dog-s**t or sewers; I have not described them as 'vile' or 'odious'. Together they have fragmented Great Britiain and now keep us under watch through SIX MILLION cameras. Sorry, Jeff...the author of this piece was making mischief and for the wonderful FM.COM to have 'put it up' was bad judgement. In closing, let's not hear anything about 'rants' and 'blowing a fuse', eh? I'd much prefer to be sitting here making some traces or whipping an old cane rod; but as someone who has been politically kicked from pillar to post along with millions of others I feel it right to rebel a bit when necessary. Now where are those f***ing forceps?


Add a comment

  • Email to a friend Email to a friend
  • Print version Print version
  • Plain text Plain text

Tagged as:

No tags for this article

Follow FishingMagic!