Home | Features | Coarse Fishing | General | Chub, Otters, Barbel and Heroes. Welchy Weighs In: December

Chub, Otters, Barbel and Heroes. Welchy Weighs In: December

By

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
With old friend and angling hero Pete Springate earlier this month With old friend and angling hero Pete Springate earlier this month

Welchy has a bottle of champagne at his side and a few things he wants to say, best take cover.

 

 

"The time has come," the Walrus said,
"To talk of many things:”

 

 

 

 

It’s actually Christmas Day as I sit down to write my December ‘Weigh In’ but in the glorious spirit of Scrooge and all of the ‘Bah Humbuggers’ it is not a festival I choose to celebrate. I know and fully respect, however, that most of the readers of FishingMagic probably do, so Merry Xmas!


I am, however, sitting here with a bottle of champagne so this could get messy...


After having a whinge in my last monthly outing that winter, and hence the start of my fishing proper, hadn’t yet arrived I’ve been rather disappointed again in that, so far, we have still only had one night of frost down here and, although conditions have deteriorated somewhat, it’s still not really winter!


Hardly earth-shattering stuff but it was good to get outWe did, however, have a little bit of rain and with some very mild, low pressure following on from a run of cool nights (and the aforementioned single frost) there was the ‘perfect storm’ as far as barbel fishing was concerned on 22 December when everything was pretty well lined up for a feeding spell.


I had not fished all month but even I couldn’t resist those conditions and spent four hours that evening beside a local beat of river for a brace of 5lb chub and a barbel of around 8lb. Hardly earth-shattering stuff, but it was nevertheless very nice to be out and the new bait I’ve been working on caught first time out on a new venue, which was quite reassuring!


It has been a terrific month as far as FishingMagic is concerned though and I’ve thoroughly enjoyed the features we have been able to bring you recently; many of them inspired by the writing competition.


In this respect many congratulations to Christian Barker on a well-deserved November competition win for his ‘Winter Chubbing’ feature which got a lot of people talking on the forum. I’ve long been an advocate of the ‘give ‘em enough rope’ method of chub bite detection and to see it written about is all too rare. I have always tended to use a bobbin on a very long drop rather than an open bail arm as such but there is no doubt that in the right circumstances it can make the difference between a fish on the bank and not.


One other little tweak that has caught me quite a few big chub is the way I hook my bait; I very often fish the maggot feeder for chub at this time of year and quite how a bloody big chub can sometimes pick up the very tip of a single maggot in its lips without pricking itself has always amazed me. These days if they are a bit cagey I just side hook the maggot (a single red on a size 18 or 20 usually) and they tend prick themselves every time.


I always enjoy Kevin Perkins’ features and his ‘Heroes and Villains’ piece really made me smile; I’m surprised there were not more member contributions to the categories on the forum but I certainly have to add a couple of my own here.


Gibbo - A hero As far as heroes are concerned I would have to add Jim Gibbinson; those of a certain age will, perhaps, remember his TV escapades in ‘The Fishing Race’ where, with partner Jim Gillespie, he was fishing for the ‘Golden Maggot’ but there is far more to this delightfully ascerbically-witted Kent angler than many will be aware. His contribution to early carp fishing, for example, was monumental, and often overlooked, but for me it was his 1983 book ‘Modern Specimen Hunting’ which was the inspiration and he, more than Walker, was the one who steered my early specimen angling approach – although Jim himself was, of course, part of the ‘Walker-inspired generation.’


They say you should never meet your heroes but I would have to disagree on the basis of my few experiences, both in angling and without, and one of my very fondest and most treasured angling memories is a day on the Medway estuary mullet fishing (for that is what he specialises in these days) with Jim. Happy days indeed.


Also missing, for me, is another man of Kent and another angler who made a huge contribution to early carp fishing – Fred Wilton. Fred’s knowledge of bait really is second to none and his ‘Towards the Ultimate Bait’ feature shaped my entire thinking on the subject and my introduction, years later, to his barbel baits just blew my mind. Fred was, and remains, in a league of his own.


My final hero is yet another carp legend – why is it so many of the best big fish anglers were once dedicated carpers? – Sir Pete Springate. I caught up with Pete over far too many glasses of wine earlier this month and he is quietly doing to giant barbel what he once did to giant carp. Legend.


In Kevin’s ‘Jury’s Out’ category my only nomination is the Angling Trust. It is no secret that I am a long-time critic of the organisation but this year, for the first time in my mind, there were signs that they are finally beginning to get their act together and so I’m happy to ‘promote’ them from ‘villain’. 

OK so they are ten years too late with ‘Cormorant Watch’ and have, thus far, failed to address the main problem facing anglers (of which more later) but there is progress!


And so to the real villains! Our pastime (it is not a sport) has always attracted more than its fair share of villains - and I’ve been unfortunate enough to have known quite a few of them. At the time of writing I’ve not quite had enough champagne to name them, but the day is young...


In the news features this month a couple of related pieces caught my attention. Firstly the Environment Agency’s stocking of young Calverton barbel into the Rivers Ouse and Ouzel and, secondly, the formation of a new group to highlight the lack of action on otter predation.


I am a great supporter of the work of the EA’s fisheries departments, they do a lot of very good work with the resources they have at their disposal and are not appreciated by many anglers, some of whom simply complain about a ‘waste of their licence money.’ However, the introduction of young barbel into Adams Mill struck me as being very short-sighted and a case, as Richard Bowler commented on the forum, of ‘putting a sticking plaster on a terminally ill patient’.


Yours truly fish spotting from the Adams Mill bridge - you wouldn't see many now...My PB barbel is still the ‘Traveller’ from Adams Mill and the loss of this fish – and the rest of the Mill giants – due to otters, was heartbreaking. I welcome the habitat improvement and fish introductions on the Ouse but the river has deep-rooted problems which a few fish will not correct and these young barbel are simply destined to be otter fodder.


Enter the ridiculously named ‘English Carp Defence League’ founded by Mark Holmes to highlight the lack of action in respect of otter predation on primarily carp, but barbel and other species too.


In addition to the loss of the Adams Mill barbel Norfolk’s marvellous Sayers Meadow project has also been hit by otters and the massive habitat improvement work undertaken by the Norfolk Anglers’ Conservation Association over many years appears to have hit an unexpected wall. I’m reliably informed by the likes of respected Oxford angler John Everard that his local rivers have been decimated, ditto with my colleagues on fisheries such as Throop and other southern rivers and my own eyes are now seeing the first double figure barbel carcasses on the Kennet with the tell-tale signs of otter attack.


It’s a difficult subject to attempt to tackle in a short comment piece such as this and much of the ‘evidence’ is anectdotal. As a scientist I’m trained to accept facts, and there are not enough of them to draw definite conclusions in many cases. It is clear, however, that on many of the rivers which have been left devoid of barbel otters were only the final piece in a very complicated jigsaw which saw populations failing to self sustain due to any number of environmental factors including abstraction, discharge, habitat loss etc.


When a river ecosystem is well balanced it can support the predatory pressure an otter brings to bear, when it is on its last legs and the fishery is sustained by a small head of big fish – as many of the aforementioned systems were – the presence of an otter is likely to bring only one conclusion. Sadly the restoration of those rivers in crisis – and there are so many of them – is an expensive and essentially long term project and the presence of otters is in the here and now, short term. It could take a generation – or more – to create balance and that is something we should all be worried about.

 

We are in somewhat of a Catch 22 situation too: do nothing and some rivers could take a generation to find a predator prey balance (if indeed they do at all); call for action and risk alienating the general public who perceive otters to be cute and cuddly. No wonder some people want to hide their heads in the sand but sorry, this problem is one which is not going to go away.


As far as carp are concerned the picture is just as grim, although many will no doubt mention the essentially ‘manufactured’ environment of many carp fisheries which are stocked above what is considered to be a ‘natural’ fish biomass. But the commercials will, no doubt, deal with the problem just as they did the cormorant by putting effective predator prevention measures in place, leaving the larger and more natural venues to take the brunt of the pressure.


I applaud Mark’s efforts and have gone on the record as supporting the aims - as far as our rivers are concerned anyway - as, in my opinion, anything which helps to highlight the state of our rivers, and in so doing has the potential to bring positive change, has to be a good thing. It is, perhaps, ‘doomed to fail’ as Paul Boote and others have suggested on the forum but when it is something as important as the future of our rivers I for one would sooner try and fail than not try at all...But Mark, for goodness sake, change the name please!


Well, at this juncture I was going to comment on Fred Crouch’s barbel feed feature which has some relevance to this issue. I love Fred dearly and this piece was an interesting mix of fact and fiction but, looking up, I see the champagne bottle is empty so it may have to wait until new year.


Enjoy the festive season!







By the Same Author



Rate this article

5.00




Comments (17 posted):

chav professor on 26/12/2011 13:03:21
avatar
Its interesting you mention how a chub can pick up a single maggot and not get 'pricked'. I have seen it with my very own eyes, a six pound chub drifting off with a single maggot in its lips and striking into thin air! Fortunately it made a mistake the next day - I was fortunate to get a second chance....Very rare! I shall definately try saddle hooking them in future! Have a good time over the festivities - that champagne is well deserved! Keep up the good work. Kind regards Christian
geoffmaynard on 26/12/2011 13:30:17
avatar
A generation Ian? A balance? I don't think so. This is what I wrote a year ago and I see no reason to change my mind about any of it: http://www.fishingmagic.com/features/opinion/15042-checks-and-balances-apex-predators-and-the-balance-of-nature.html
Paul Morley on 26/12/2011 15:29:58
avatar
See first pic - didn't know you were chums with Donald Sutherland....
soffit on 26/12/2011 16:14:17
avatar
As until recently I was exclusively a member of the public rather than also a fisherman I have welcomed the return of the otter as a sign of the returning health of our rivers. This would be my stance as a MOTP; thinking fishermen are just as selfish and narrow-minded as the pigeon-fanciers that want culls of peregrines. Another species that came close to extinction in the UK due to our heedless attitude to the environment. Peregrine will always go for the easy kill. Otters probably do the same. Your 'Specimen' is possibly an old duffer that was due, in the natural order of things, for involuntary retirement.
jasonbean1 on 26/12/2011 17:19:40
avatar
As until recently I was exclusively a member of the public rather than also a fisherman I have welcomed the return of the otter as a sign of the returning health of our rivers. This would be my stance as a MOTP; thinking fishermen are just as selfish and narrow-minded as the pigeon-fanciers that want culls of peregrines. Another species that came close to extinction in the UK due to our heedless attitude to the environment. Peregrine will always go for the easy kill. Otters probably do the same. Your 'Specimen' is possibly an old duffer that was due, in the natural order of things, for involuntary retirement. liked that....think there's a few old duffers in the specy world well past retirement now...thing is the natural order for them is to catch bigger at any costs changing world and all that
soffit on 26/12/2011 18:41:14
avatar
I suspect we may be 'Pissing into the wind' here Jason:) The only specimen I had as a lad was a 18lb pike that came in like a wet blanket. As it was from a trout stream it may have spent too many years reaching that weight. My last fish of the day today was a roach about 3/4 of a pound. It gave a good account of itself but some of the standard 6 ozer's gave me more of a runaround TBH. As my wife reassures me; size isn't everything...
MarkTheSpark on 26/12/2011 21:09:47
avatar
Ian makes some fascinating observations in this article; including the observation of Pete Springate, who I ghosted for many articles back in the days when I was dep. ed. of the defunct Practical Coarse Fishing. He looks older, but still looks hard as tempered nails.... And Ian's tacit agreement that the problem on our fisheries has more to do with fish than otters is timely; it is, frankly, astonishing that the Angling Trust is wasting so much energy and effort on 'highlighting' the predator problem (as if that will do any good) and very, very little dealing with fish. Our rivers are in an appalling mess due to past 'improvements' which have never been reversed (is it really so difficult and expensive to hire a digger to put them right?) and tragic over-abstraction by the water companies. There is still subtle phthalate pollution reducing recruitment and a host of other problems which the ATr needs to tackle head-on. I must repeat the mantra; if we had good stocks of fish, we would not notice the impact of predators on fish populations. The problem is fish, not otters, and I am glad a learned scientist like Ian has confirmed this.
geoffmaynard on 27/12/2011 21:30:50
avatar
I must repeat the mantra; if we had good stocks of fish, we would not notice the impact of predators on fish populations. The problem is fish, not otters, and I am glad a learned scientist like Ian has confirmed this. But he's still supporting them Mark - and so perhaps should every angler, for these reasons if not others "I applaud Mark’s efforts and have gone on the record as supporting the aims - as far as our rivers are concerned anyway - as, in my opinion, anything which helps to highlight the state of our rivers, and in so doing has the potential to bring positive change, has to be a good thing. It is, perhaps, ‘doomed to fail’ as Paul Boote and others have suggested on the forum but when it is something as important as the future of our rivers I for one would sooner try and fail than not try at all..."
Berty on 27/12/2011 22:10:14
avatar
I must repeat the mantra; if we had good stocks of fish, we would not notice the impact of predators on fish populations. The problem is fish, not otters, and I am glad a learned scientist like Ian has confirmed this. "Learned" scientists once stated the world was flat, even though lesser mortals thought it not so.
Simon K on 27/12/2011 22:53:07
avatar
"Learned" scientists once stated the world was flat, even though lesser mortals thought it not so. Wrong way round Paul. From Pythagoras onwards (600 B.C.), the "learned scientists" all knew it was round. The "lesser mortals" took a little longer. ;)
Paul Boote on 27/12/2011 23:00:50
avatar
Wrong way round Paul. From Pythagoras onwards (600 B.C.), the "learned scientists" all knew it was round. The "lesser mortals" took a little longer. ;) Yes, the lesser mortals set up such non-user friendly outfits as the Spanish Inquisition, racking, ripping, burning and disembowelling in order to convince those in the know that they were so very wrong...
MarkTheSpark on 27/12/2011 23:46:43
avatar
But he's still supporting them Mark - and so perhaps should every angler, for these reasons if not others "I applaud Mark’s efforts and have gone on the record as supporting the aims - as far as our rivers are concerned anyway - as, in my opinion, anything which helps to highlight the state of our rivers, and in so doing has the potential to bring positive change, has to be a good thing. It is, perhaps, ‘doomed to fail’ as Paul Boote and others have suggested on the forum but when it is something as important as the future of our rivers I for one would sooner try and fail than not try at all..." He's supporting 'anything which highlights the state of our rivers', Geoff. So why aren't we campaigning on a 'Look at the state of our rivers' ticket? Not the 'Otters eat fish we like to catch' ticket? At the core of river anglers' problems (and the desertion of them to man-made ponds ensures far too few anglers know what's going on) is fish recruitment; it is poor and this may have much to do with low summer levels, pollution, or many others causes. We need to demand the EA finds out what's going wrong, report back, and campaign to turn this around. Maybe we need more nursery areas for fry, artificial channels to protect them during floods; maybe we need de-canalisation of rivers, creation of flood plains. Whatever it is, I'll join that campaign. Not the unwinnable one.
richard bowler on 28/12/2011 06:55:19
avatar
We should exactly be campaigning "look at the state of our rivers". Don't get me wrong I'm as angry as the next man at the loss of the barbel and perch fishing I enjoyed at Kickles and the Claydon brook. The thing is though, wether the otters ate them (which they did) or wether they had lived for another year or so and died of old age there was not the number of back up fish to replace them. We should be campaigning for research into why so many of our fish are not reproducing enough to self sustain their populations. Do we really want to start again every 10-15 years when the EA introduces fingerling barbel ect to replace the old fish that are now dying from old age or their numbers have fallen to such low figures due to predation. Most of us who choose to fish rivers over comercials do so because we want to fish in a natural environment, predation is natural. I have been lucky enough to fish on rivers all over the world, where the predators that the fish face are a lot bigger, uglier and more plentiful than the otter in our river systems. Where the locals rely on the fish population for protein and yet the fish are there is such numbers you wouldn't believe, why because they can reproduce successfully. The EA have made a big song and dance that the otter is now in every county in the UK, holding this up as a sign that our rivers are health. We need to be making a big song and dance when the otter starts to disappear which it surely will in our failing rivers. I also think that anglers and fishing clubs should be looking for the EA to provide habitat improvement instead of token stockings because if we are not careful all that will be happening is the otter population will be artifically fed, similar in effect to trout fed pike. No matter what happens I think the river angler has got a bitter pill to swallow for the next few years but I feel if we play our cards right we could end up with a better, healthier river system in a decade or so's time. All the best Richard - Home
john m h on 28/12/2011 08:18:44
avatar
We should exactly be campaigning "look at the state of our rivers". We should be campaigning for research into why so many of our fish are not reproducing enough to self sustain their populations. Do we really want to start again every 10-15 years when the EA introduces fingerling barbel ect. Most of us who choose to fish rivers over comercials do so because we want to fish in a natural environment, predation is natural. The EA have made a big song and dance that the otter is now in every county in the UK, holding this up as a sign that our rivers are health. We need to be making a big song and dance when the otter starts to disappear which it surely will in our failing rivers. I also think that anglers and fishing clubs should be looking for the EA to provide habitat improvement instead of token stockings No matter what happens I think the river angler has got a bitter pill to swallow for the next few years but I feel if we play our cards right we could end up with a better, healthier river system in a decade or so's time. All the best Richard - Home Well gents the answer is in our own hands I'm not sure how many contributing to this thread are members of any of the groups that make up the ATr 'Specialist Angling Freshwater Group, which has a place on the ATr National Freshwater Committee, attend and are part of the Regional Freshwater Forums, or indeed a member of the ATr itself? When the notice for the last SAFG meeting was sent out, which incidentally stressed that this would be a combined meeting with the Predation Action Group, the take up was abysmal with only two actually replying to the invite, I know I was one, I beleive the other was dear old Bob H; subsequently the meeting was cancelled and the 'Group' now communicates, when it does, via a closed google group. As I say, the answer is in our own hands, but not by way of splinter groups. Use the ATr, the SAFG and the Regional Freshwater Forums, now funded by the EA as it sees these Regional Fora as the main conduit between the ordinary angler, via the ATr, and itself at national level. Its taken some time for the ATr to recognise SA, so lets make use of it. I doubt we can rely on match anglers as they are only, in the most, interested in the cash side of 'angling' and are happy to fish in pigswill just as long as they can pick up the coin. Whilst your pondering that and looking for something to occupy the time, have a look HERE
Berty on 28/12/2011 08:32:42
avatar
Wrong way round Paul. From Pythagoras onwards (600 B.C.), the "learned scientists" all knew it was round. The "lesser mortals" took a little longer. ;) But those who knew were not thought of as "learned scientists" at the time......they were ridiculed. Just as those who see what is happening today....... My own view is simple.........rivers are not in a state that can support otters and to incourage them in any way will simply not do them or us any good whatsoever.
Fred Bonney on 28/12/2011 09:07:08
avatar
The Yorkshire branch of the Institute of Fisheries Management (IFM) are organising a one-day seminar, with the EA's support, to examine the issues of predators in greater depth. The IFM is a non-profit organisation controlled by members sharing a common interest in the modern management of recreational and commercial fisheries. Topics for the day will be broadly organised into fish-eating birds, seals, otters and less acknowledged predators such as signal crayfish. After each session there will be time for you to question the panel of presenters. The venue is the conference centre at Goole Leisure Centre on Saturday 18 February 2012, between 09:00 and 17:00. The IFM will be charging attendees a small fee (£10). Tea. coffee and a buffet lunch will be provided. For more information contact the event organiser, Mike Lee careers@ifm.org.uk
Paul Boote on 28/12/2011 09:53:29
avatar
Such seminars, to my mind, whether held by the IFM or the Game Conservancy (the Game v. The Verminous Rest outfit rebranded and renamed several years ago to become the more touchy-feely sounding, public friendly Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust), are mere sticking plasters on the self-inflicted near-terminal wound caused by long-term cavalier mistreatment of the wider natural environment and the terrible results that it has brought, mere exercises in closing the stabledoor after the horse has bolted, of treating a patient for acne or unsightly spots when he has smallpox...


Add a comment

  • Email to a friend Email to a friend
  • Print version Print version
  • Plain text Plain text

Tagged as:

barbel, Ian Welch, Chub, otters

Follow FishingMagic!