I always test the fishinglines I buy, and I have the strong impression nobody else does! The results are realy impressing though. There is a tendency to mostly give up a diamter slightly less than the diameter I find by using a simple but reliable micrometer. So far so good. But when it comes to breakingstrain the results are devastating! Even when I don't count the breakings on the knot, there is in nylon lines at least an exagerration between 25 to 50%(!!) of what you will achieve on a simple testingdevice.
In Dyneema the figures on the blisters seem to have no fundation at all to reality. Marketingmanagers dream them up behind their pc's. You'r a lucky man when by testing you can get halve the figure on the spool.
Why in the world is there never a fishingmagzine (to my knowledge) that realy tests the claims a manufacturer makes??
And why in the world is there not an institute that gives on objective (DIN)
norm that is given on the spool?
Give us a tested maximum diameter and a tested minimum breakingstrain.
Can't be that difficult, can it???