I sure if you look back at the record list the River Lea has held the record 3 or 4 times for the chub. There are a few known chub over 8lb, and a couple just over 9lb. My money is on the Lea for a chub record also.
As for a Barbel record, there are a few rivers that have some very big fish, I am talking over 19lb.
The Thames could throw up something close, don't think the Seven will, but my money would be on two rivers, the Trent, and the other I am not saying, for obvious reasons.
---------- Post added at 23:04 ---------- Previous post was at 22:43 ----------
If we are honest, we don't know just what are in our rivers, because there aren't enough angels on the bank, and many anglers now keep what they have caught, close to their chest.
I don't also go along 100% with such reports as these for one reason, they are based on their findings. I have found such reports a little hit and miss. They don't cover all the river, how can they.
I find anglers fishing the rivers have more of an idea of what is or isn't in the venue. The EA, did a report about fishers green a few years back. To put it simple, there were way off regarding the size of fish. Yes they said there were big chub and Barbel, but nothing backing them up, WRONG.
Barbel of around the 1lb mark, small chub from a few ounces plus, Roach 3oz to a few fish over 2lb, plus Perch, Pike, Dace and Carp, have all been caught since, and only just after the report came out. I am not saying these reports are wrong in every way, but i don't take everything they say as done and dusted.
---------- Post added at 23:28 ---------- Previous post was at 23:04 ----------
I don't know why, but as soon as Barbel start to move off from a section of water, Otters are to blame. The Ouse Barbel move up and down the river all the time, never staying in one place all the time.
St Neots used to have Otters there years ago, the fishing was great. I am not saying Otters don't eat fish, but they don't just eat Barbel. If they did the river Lea at fishers Green wouldn't have anything at all in it. Otters have been there for many years.
As soon as someone reports an Otter on a section of river, before you know it, they are in every inch of the river, which just isn't true. Otters in the Ouse, yes we know they are, but in some sections, not everywhere. You also have to look back when our rivers were full of fish, they also had plenty of Otters.
Strange that when the Otters were wiped out, the fish stocks started to decline, yet now Otters are back, fish stocks on rivers are getting better, if this wasn't true, how come more anglers are starting to fish rivers again.