benny samways
Well-known member
Is it not reasonable to assume lipids are picked up by taste buds, as these taste buds are not solely located in the mouth, as you know these are also located on the barbules, pelvic and pectoral fins and down its lateral line.
As these oils are lifting from a bait, particularly if the oil molecules are carrying other substances, is it not also reasonable to assume these are probably picked up as a carp swims past a baited area?
I would say, no.
This is my very basic understanding of it; Chemoreception is the carp's mechanism for detecting food. For a carp to detect anything it has to be soluble. Some substances will attract their receptors, some may repel and others will be neutral. Oils are not soluble and are therefore not detectable by carp in water. Any soluble products with the oil would be tiny and if we are talking chilli or something then that isnt oil its something carried by the oil.
Carp do not 'taste' like we do, they have no preference for things, they either detect something or they dont. Taste is an abstract concept that describes how humans experience food. So just because a carp has taste buds do not expect them to function as humans do. Carp eat ****, stones, stinking silt, bloodworms etc etc.