Home | News/Events | News | Environment Agency Investigates Anglers who Exposed Llanberis Pollution.

Environment Agency Investigates Anglers who Exposed Llanberis Pollution.

By

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

After warning the Environment Agency over two decades that sewage was destroying a once pristine protected lake, the Agency has turned on the anglers who have been lobbying to stop the pollution.

 

A press release from Fish Legal states:

When the Llanberis lake or Llyn Padarn - a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) in Snowdonia - turned green in 2009, the Agency said it was a "natural phenomenon" and nothing to worry about, blaming climate change. But now, despite its own reports which admit that treated and untreated sewage is the main cause of decline of the lake, the Agency is investigating the angling club's activities, alleging that fishing for arctic char in the lake could be damaging the environment.


Chris Mills, the head of the Agency in Wales, wrote to Fish Legal asking for its member club to supply catch returns so that the Agency could assess the impact of angling as an "economic activity" under the Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) (Wales) Regulations 2009.


This comes from the Environment Agency in direct response to Fish Legal challenging the Agency's inaction by formally notifying them of environmental damage at Llyn Padarn in accordance with the Regulations back in February. - citing the sewage problem.
This is the latest twist in a long running battle between the Environment Agency and Fish Legal, which has been acting for the Seiont, Gwyrfai and Llyfni Fishing Society in connection with the pollution in Llyn Padarn since the early 1990s.


Justin Neal, Head Solicitor at Fish Legal said:

"This is possibly the most cynical response I've had from the Agency in this case so far. The club has fought tirelessly for years to try and stop Welsh Water polluting the lake - even taking them to court in 1993 which, despite losing the case, resulted in phosphate stripping being introduced at the Llanberis treatment works. For the Agency to even consider that the club is in some way responsible for the decline in char numbers is absolutely absurd. The evidence that the sewage is damaging the lake and the char habitat is, on the other hand, clear and confirmed by Agency's own reports. When the Agency is reluctant to act on patently obvious evidence and turns on the campaigners, one has to question the motives of the Agency. The Agency is also just plain wrong in suggesting that angling is causing damage to the environment. If that were so, what has the Agency as the fisheries regulator been doing for the last 20 years? The Agency needs to reconsider its whole approach to protecting the environment and do what is right - not what suits it politically or makes a bad situation look better for it and the water company"


The Seiont, Gwyrfai and Llyfni Fishing Society Secretary Huw Hughes said:

"My worry is that the regulator has a very cosy relationship with the polluter and doesn't seem willing to do much about the obvious problem. Our angling club has been fishing the lake responsibly since 1908 and its members currently fish the lake infrequently because the fishing for salmon, trout and char is so bad. We only caught single figures of char last year - yet the sewage keeps coming and we find brown sludge from the algae at the far end of the lake. It was the club which complained to the Agency and its predecessor since the 1990's but with no progress. Now they are pointing the finger at us."


Mark Lloyd, Chief Executive of Fish Legal and the Angling Trust said:

"The Environment Agency is trying to use regulations intended for the control of industrial operations to investigate a few anglers with rods. The Agency has a duty to protect and improve the water environment and angling, but instead seems hell bent on protecting the right of a water company to spill sewage into a beautiful upland lake. What used to be a brilliant fishery, enjoyed by local anglers and visitors, has declined because of its inaction as a regulator. It should be apologising to anglers, not accusing them of damaging fish stocks." 

 

In a response Sian Williams from Environment Agency Wales, said:

“We are trying to build a complete picture of all the impacts on the lake and have asked Fish Legal, as well as other organisations and businesses that could impact on the lake, for some basic information to help us get this.

There is no allegation whatsoever that we are blaming the local angling club and have already discussed this simple request with them. We are trying to work with all interested parties to restore the water quality and charr population in the lake to the best condition possible.”

 







By the Same Author



Rate this article

0




Comments (12 posted):

the blanker on 07/08/2012 17:00:26
avatar
About time all anglers refused to buy a licence.
Morespiders on 07/08/2012 20:17:00
avatar
About time all anglers refused to buy a licence. Great idea but that wont happen, makes you so mad, the water companies and the EA get away with murder, and work hand in hand, that wont ever change
stu_the_blank on 08/08/2012 07:00:42
avatar
About time all anglers refused to buy a licenceThere are plenty of people on here who think that paying fishing tax is money well spent, even to the point of advocating buying additional licences to 'support' them, for those who don't get it, the EA is a giant Govt Dept with a very political purpose (they serve the Govt and the establishment), angling is a very long way down their list of priorities. Stu
the blanker on 08/08/2012 09:32:03
avatar
There are plenty of people on here who think that paying fishing tax is money well spent, even to the point of advocating buying additional licences to 'support' them, for those who don't get it, the EA is a giant Govt Dept with a very political purpose (they serve the Govt and the establishment), angling is a very long way down their list of priorities. Stu I dont know anyone that would buy two licences if they didnt fish more than two rods, whether angling is a long way down the EAs list of priorities as a whole isnt the point, our licence money is supposed to go to the fisheries arm of the EA to protect waterways, the word environment in their name is the clue that they are supposed to look after the environment and in this case they clearly are not, just another case of the EA working hand in glove with water companies.
loggerhead on 08/08/2012 11:42:47
avatar
This is a classic example of why we need the Angling Trust and Fish Legal. The EA fisheries people are wonderful, but that can't always be said about other departments within the EA.
bennygesserit on 08/08/2012 21:58:01
avatar
Another bit of biased Journalism ( nearly - maybe its just cut and paste ) from FM. Don't you guys think you need to get at least some of the facts before you jerk your knees ? In a response Sian Williams from Environment Agency Wales, said: “We are trying to build a complete picture of all the impacts on the lake and have asked Fish Legal, as well as other organisations and businesses that could impact on the lake, for some basic information to help us get this. There is no allegation whatsoever that we are blaming the local angling club and have already discussed this simple request with them. We are trying to work with all interested parties to restore the water quality and charr population in the lake to the best condition possible.” ---------- Post added at 22:58 ---------- Previous post was at 22:52 ---------- There are plenty of people on here who think that paying fishing tax is money well spent, even to the point of advocating buying additional licences to 'support' them, for those who don't get it, the EA is a giant Govt Dept with a very political purpose (they serve the Govt and the establishment), angling is a very long way down their list of priorities. Stu the Think that was probably me on a thread re the Angling Trust , I actually did it one year by istake and just never claimed it back ( they sold me the wrong type of license ) still I don;t adhere to the view that every Gov department is full of wasters and dullards
stu_the_blank on 09/08/2012 07:01:24
avatar
still I don;t adhere to the view that every Gov department is full of wasters and dullards Neither do I Ben. The people who run these state machines are very clever and devious. They manipulate weaker minds, fob the rest of us off and pursue the agenda of their masters, which isn't us. You carry on paying your tax with a smile. The only thing that will make them take fisheries seriously is a political price if they don't. As has been aired ad nauseum, the majority of anglers aren't interested. So we get what we deserve, ignored, at best fobbed off, and trampled all over. If they can get angling for Char banned, nobody will know that the pollution has all but wiped them out, therefor the Govt-speak can deny the problem exists. If you think that I'm being cynical, you haven't been involved long enough. Stu
bennygesserit on 09/08/2012 07:25:47
avatar
Neither do I Ben. The people who run these state machines are very clever and devious. They manipulate weaker minds, fob the rest of us off and pursue the agenda of their masters, which isn't us. You carry on paying your tax with a smile. The only thing that will make them take fisheries seriously is a political price if they don't. As has been aired ad nauseum, the majority of anglers aren't interested. So we get what we deserve, ignored, at best fobbed off, and trampled all over. If they can get angling for Char banned, nobody will know that the pollution has all but wiped them out, therefor the Govt-speak can deny the problem exists. If you think that I'm being cynical, you haven't been involved long enough. Stu No i haven't been involved long enough but I know for a fact how dedicated some who work in the public services are , like me for instance i average about 3 hours a week , working in my own time , keeping up with technology so i can still be good at my job , even though i am now the wrong side of 50 , like the social worker I know who spent Christmas Day , in her own time , making sure one of her clients didn't commit suicide. There are many many examples of this that I see every day. To say these people are devious is just a nonsense generalisation.
The bad one on 09/08/2012 14:39:27
avatar
No one doubts there are very committed public servants in the public sector. But there are many that don't give a sh*t and are only looking to screw the public over for their political masters and their agenda. Of course this brings its own rewards to these types in career moves up the greasy pole and the big bucks that come with it. Tow the line, say what the masters want you to say and the positions and money will follow, as night follows day. And if you're really good at it, they might even give you a knighthood when you reach the top of the sh*theap. Oh and I've been in and observed this game for over 40 years, seen it so many times that the same bullsh*t from the early days is now being recycled again. It's naive to think otherwise. The name is missed named... Environment Agency my arse! It's the Environment Destruction Agency.
Jeff Woodhouse on 09/08/2012 18:47:51
avatar
Oh and I've been in and observed this game for over 40 years, seen it so many times that the same bullsh*t from the early days is now being recycled again. Saves wasting it though, Phil! ;) :D :D You are spot on though. I love the Fisheries people as was mentioned above by Loggerhead, but there are departments within the EA that are out to meet their own ends and if that includes the odd pollution and the deaths of thousands of fish every now and then, so what? As for knighthoods, there'll be a few expecting some kind of Honour over the hydro fiasco, but how when their shining example, the Romney scheme, isn't expected to go live for a few more months yet making it over 1 year late in delivery. Don't know about knighthoods, the stocks need to be brought back. The EA is the biggest dis-organisation in the country.
stu_the_blank on 09/08/2012 19:13:00
avatar
To say these people are devious is just a nonsense generalisationDo you run a Whitehall Dept? Read my post. Do you honestly think that you can rise to the top of a Govt Dept without being devious? Or do you think that a couple of hour IT will do it? Please read before you post. Stu
Paul Boote on 09/08/2012 20:26:38
avatar
Do you run a Whitehall Dept? Read my post. Do you honestly think that you can rise to the top of a Govt Dept without being devious? Whitehall? SmiteAll? Mere carping, State School also-rans when compared with the Awfully Nice, Seemingly Plausible Chaps (Until Horribly Caught) who hire and fire Them and take the wee out of Us - well, pretty well most of Us, present poster excluded. But do carry on with the usual round of mixed victimhood, outrage and paranoid "They're takin' the mick!" conspiracy theory: it's the only thing a lot of Brits have left to them nowadays, after all.


Add a comment

  • Email to a friend Email to a friend
  • Print version Print version
  • Plain text Plain text

Tagged as:

Environment Agency, Fish Legal, Llanberis Lake

Follow FishingMagic!