Home | News/Events | News | Clawford Fishery Fined for Invasive Species

Clawford Fishery Fined for Invasive Species

By

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

The owners of Devon’s Clawford Fishery have been ordered to pay nearly £35,000 in fines and costs for keeping two invasive species of fish in their lakes.

 

The Environment Agency report that:


The case, taken by the Environment Agency, is the first of its kind in the region.


Non-native fish pose major risks to native fish and other wildlife; they can out-compete them for food and habitat, change the habitats they live in, spread disease and parasites and even eat  native fish. Keeping such fish without a licence is an offence under the Import of Live Fish (England and Wales) Act 1980. When licences are granted, they are subject to strict conditions.


Checks at Clawford Fishery, a commercial fishery owned by John and Wanda Ray, revealed the presence of two potentially invasive species; topmouth gudgeon and wels catfish, in several of the 17 lakes at the site. The lakes flow into the River Claw, connected to the River Tamar and the presence of these highly invasive fish posed a direct risk to the rivers valuable salmon populations.


Although only 3 – 4 inches long, the topmouth gudgeon, is one of the higest risk non-native species in Europe and consequently is not permitted in any waters. Wels catfish is Europe’s largest freshwater fish and can be a voracious predator. In fully-enclosed stillwaters, licences for keeping wels catfish may be issued, but in open sites connected to rivers, like Clawford, it poses a serious risk to other fish populations and cannot be kept.


Matt Brazier, for the Environment Agency said:

“Invasive non-native fish pose serious risks to our native species and habitats and are incredibly costly to the angling industry and the vital recreation and employment opportunities it provides. The Environment Agency is working hard with fishery owners and the fishing industry to prevent their spread and where high risk invasive fish are stocked illegally we will take appropriate action to ensure they are contained and removed”


Earlier this year the Agency launched a large scale operation to contain and remove topmouth gudgeon and wels catfish from Clawford Fishery. During the operation native fish stocks were rescued and held in quarantine while an organic ‘piscicide’ was applied to eradicate the invasive fish. The piscicide is designed to only remove fish and is not harmful to other wildlife. Once it had broken down, the native fish were returned and angling resumed at the site.


The fish removal and clean up operation at Clawford cost around £170,000 and lasted several weeks. The Agency will continue to monitor the site, but early indications are that the operation has been successful.


John and Wanda Ray, Clawford Fishery, Holsworthy, Devon, were fined a total of £4,950 and ordered to pay £30,000 costs by Barnstaple magistrates after pleading guilty to five offences under the Import of Live Fish (England and Wales) Act 1980.







By the Same Author



Rate this article

0




Comments (11 posted):

Paul Boote on 21/09/2012 11:27:33
avatar
High time. Too many getting away with to hell with the rules, think of the income, fishy micky-taking - illegal imports, guerrilla stockings etc - for far too long. Can't help feeling, however, that if the lakes had not had outflows that entered a salmon river (the Tamar in the case featured above), the prosecution would never have been brought.
cg74 on 21/09/2012 12:48:46
avatar
High time. Too many getting away with to hell with the rules, think of the income, fishy micky-taking - illegal imports, guerrilla stockings etc - for far too long. Can't help feeling, however, that if the lakes had not had outflows that entered a salmon river (the Tamar in the case featured above), the prosecution would never have been brought. Sadly I think you're right.... An ecological inequality! Still, I'm pleased the offender is being hit hard.
bennygesserit on 21/09/2012 12:59:18
avatar
Fined for the catfish presumably not the gudgeon
Mr Cholmondeley-Corker (PaSC) on 21/09/2012 14:05:12
avatar
"Although only 3 – 4 inches long, the topmouth gudgeon, is one of the higest risk non-native species in Europe and consequently is not permitted in any waters." From another EA press release Despite being only 3-4 centimetres long, topmouth gudgeon are particularly threatening to native fish in Britain, and are number seven on the Environment Agency’s list of most wanted invasive species. As well as eating the eggs of other fish, topmouths, which were introduced to the wild in Britain in the 1960s from their native Asia, breed at four-times the rate of native fish and carry a parasite, similar to, or possibly the same as, a disease called "rosette agent" which is found in some US fish stocks Topmouth Gudgeon also eat vast quantities of plant life and invertebrates, which upsets the natural balance of a pond, lake or river. As a result, algal blooms can occur turning the water into a green soup. Had they been left to thrive in the pond, it was feared that they would have seriously affected the ecology of the pond.
the blanker on 21/09/2012 16:50:13
avatar
High time. Too many getting away with to hell with the rules, think of the income, fishy micky-taking - illegal imports, guerrilla stockings etc - for far too long. Can't help feeling, however, that if the lakes had not had outflows that entered a salmon river (the Tamar in the case featured above), the prosecution would never have been brought.[/QUOTE] i doubt it as well, i know of a water close to my home that has been illegaly stocked with Wells Catfish twice, its common knowledge that they are in the water, the controlling club knows as does the estate whos land the water is on, i wonder what the EA would do if i reported the water? not much i think.
Eric Edwards on 21/09/2012 18:42:17
avatar
The EA regard the topmouth gudgeon as a more serious threat - mainly because it is! There are quite a few illegal catfish around yet they aren't being targetted. Topmouth gudgeon are like an invasion of ants, extremely fecund and suited to our climate, they can come to dominate a water, pushing out native species.
Paul Boote on 21/09/2012 18:56:28
avatar
Yet, I assure you that if large cats were to start rolling in the pools of many a British salmon or sea-trout river, divers with spearguns would be sent in, nets used, coarsefishers hired to catch them, with high explosive being employed if all else failed. I cannot tell you how much many gamefishers dislike interloping coarse fish - particularly spawn hooverers like barbel (I first saw them at work on the Hants Avon below spawning salmon one late December when I was in my late teens decades ago - amazing) - every bit as much as some of the chaps who fish or own "instant carp" waters do, er, otters, nowadays...
S-Kippy on 21/09/2012 19:15:08
avatar
Without ever condoning it I can understand why a fishery owner might stock catfish but why topmouth gudgeon:confused:
Eric Edwards on 21/09/2012 20:53:42
avatar
They don't stock them intentionally, they arrive (often from abroad) as passengers on other fish. They are capable of clinging, limpet-like, on the inside of a carp's mouth for instance.
on 21/09/2012 21:09:31
avatar
Do we need fish from abroad in our lakes? Oh, i forgot, most of them are carp!!!
eel611 on 23/09/2012 17:47:47
avatar
Crikey!! Sounds like a right nightmare!


Add a comment

  • Email to a friend Email to a friend
  • Print version Print version
  • Plain text Plain text

Tagged as:

Environment Agency, Clawford Vineyard

Follow FishingMagic!