Seperate Fish Records

[steph mckenzie]

Should there be a seperate British Rod Caught Fish Record for River and Stillwater species ?

 

[Lord Paul of Sheffield]

To be honest I couldn't care less

I dont know the weight of any of the "Record" fish and I'm not the slightest did bothered who caught them

 

[barbelboi]

IMO yes.
The main problem could be 'dodgy' anglers claiming still water fish were actually river fish - I fish a few venues where a river runs alongside and a few yards from a still water.
Jerry

PS Bet if you caught that 2lb+ rudd you would weight it Paul.

 

[steph mckenzie]

To be honest I couldn't care less

I dont know the weight of any of the "Record" fish and I'm not the slightest did bothered who caught them

Is that a NO then .........

 

[mol]

Should there be a seperate British Rod Caught Fish Record for River and Stillwater species ?

The record fish should be the biggest fish of that species caught regardless of where it was caught. Nice and simple

 

[rains]

No it should not matter where it was caught river canal or stillwater

 

[little oik]

The record is the highest attainable weight for that species .It should just be kept to the single entity otherwise where will it stop .North and South Stillwater ,Syndicate or commercial the list could go on .

 

[cg74]

NO, definitely not, they (BRFC) need to get their house in order long before adding more complications. Read through this if you don't understand what I'm on about: http://www.fishingmagic.com/forums/predator-fishing/220285-biggest-catfish-uk.html

That and I really can't see any point to it.

 

[chav professor]

There is definately something wrong with the BRFC. Should a simple picture surfice for a roach record - so long as it is clear and sufficient quality for identification purposes........

In case i get a record Chub (lol) I carry a measure, keep sack and could get someone up at most hours of the day..........