B
Berty
Guest
Another thread got me thinking........
IMO it is the fish that is the part that matters for record purposes, the angler has something that is special to him or her but it the fish that should be recorded to the best of our abilities.
I got to thinking about how records are caught, either by design, the unexpected or just sheer accident.
from an anglers point of view what is the most meritous record?
To me it still has to be Clarrisa and that man again.
Thoughts please?
IMO it is the fish that is the part that matters for record purposes, the angler has something that is special to him or her but it the fish that should be recorded to the best of our abilities.
I got to thinking about how records are caught, either by design, the unexpected or just sheer accident.
from an anglers point of view what is the most meritous record?
To me it still has to be Clarrisa and that man again.
Thoughts please?