Food for Thought?

FishingMagic

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 26, 2009
Messages
277,087
Reaction score
8
After fishing all night on one of my club gravel-pits in Essex, the dawn chorus back then was indescribably beautiful and very loud. Tens…hundreds of thousands of birds of different species heralded another day in a joyous cacophony of whistles and songs.

There were half a dozen big, gin-clear pits, each teeming with fish and other wildlife now classified as rare – water voles were two-a-penny – and these waters could have raised one of England’s grottiest corners to become a premier site of scientific interest with bird-watching and all manner of water-sports. But this was Essex – close to London and all too convenient for the capital’s rubbish and industrial waste.

Corruption was rife with every rule in the book being broken in order to cheaply dispose of horrific chemical cocktails by the millions of gallons. With the blessing of Thurrock Council, just about every pit and lake in the area was back-filled by a number of disposal companies who became very, very wealthy on their illegal practices. The police were not interested. Neither was the local press despite my protestations and letters to them. During the hours of darkness, convoys of up to 15 lorries at a time would race onto the site nose-to-tail in order to dump as much prohibited material as possible before sun-up…then it would return to normal, as if the night-time frenzy had never happened.

At times, the ground would erupt in a deafening explosion and always there was a sickly fug hanging over the site and over the adjacent housing estate. Cyanide could be found, granulated, in drums; and mountains of literally millions of barbiturate phials dumped just yards from the school playing field.

I was just a teenager, but I was fully aware even then that these foul deeds were just the tip of the iceberg which would blot the country’s landscape beyond recovery. Today, nearly 50 years on, most of these once-idyllic areas lie barren and useless, their suitability for housing or other development deemed ‘unsafe’: the ground is toxic.
To this day, the memories are bitter and the title ‘Thurrock Council’ leaves a bad taste in the mouth. Essex had nothing less than a natural paradise of potentially international importance – but the b*****ds filled the lot with rubbish and this same crime would have been played-out, I’m sure, all around the country, ousting untold numbers of birds and mammals and insects from their homes.

My lingering resentment is pointless; it’s history and nothing will bring back those beautiful, bountiful areas in which I spent the entirety of my teenage years, but maybe we can learn from the ‘mistakes’ and the greed of the past by adopting a proper ‘reclamation’ regime which sees councils and aggregate companies legally obliged to develop or merely conserve the oases they create. In the meantime, I strongly suggest that angling clubs and allied organizations refuse to allow the annihilation of their precious pits and quarries – even if it means level-headed wellie-wearers blocking the bulldozers’ paths and creating merry-hell. Whether or not you regard Extinction Rebellion as a bunch of left-wing pawns or as well-meaning, conscientious individuals, you must admire their willingness to stand-up (or sit down) for what they believe in and I think we as anglers should be equally active in our opposition to corporate destruction.


Source Article...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

The bad one

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 8, 2008
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
2,114
Location
Manchester
Alas we are more than likely going back to the future of the 1960s. Regulation and the agreements of fetters to stop such things happening are now days away from being lifted. Trump has already done it, how long before his clone follows suit?
 

mikench

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
27,412
Reaction score
17,772
Location
leafy cheshire
There is a glimmer of hope as the cost of remediation remains high that contaminated land remains of little use for deveolopment but of interest to animals and insects. We need the RSPB, NT et al to acquire these places for posterity and for fauna and flora and species other then man. Obviously if the contamination is severe then the owners of such places will need exclusions of liability which should remain with local authorities who allowed or turned a blind eye to flagrant breaches of the law.

Animals can soon reclaim forlorn landscapes and thrive.
 

no-one in particular

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
7,592
Reaction score
3,330
Location
australia
I knew four blokes that turned an old coal slag heap into a lovely lake for duck shooting and nature once. I think they got the land quite cheap as it was useless for much else.
Angling clubs, private groups, the angling trust, wealthier commercials concerns who want to expand a bit. Just all I can think of for now; couldn’t some or all of these reclaim these places. If four blokes can do it for duck shooting and nature why not for angling and nature.
The angling trust could spearhead this one and provide funds to help out from all those grants they get. There are nature council's money, fishing license money, license fine money, pollution fines and damages etc. Is there a better way to spend this money?
 
Last edited:

steve2

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Messages
4,651
Reaction score
1,782
Location
Worcestershire
The area you talking about is where the Thames crossing is planned. They have had to change the planned route because the contaminated ground.
 

Cliff Hatton

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 2, 2009
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
4
Location
Mid Wales
The area you talking about is where the Thames crossing is planned. They have had to change the planned route because the contaminated ground.

That's certainly in the same borough, Steve, but actually a different area to the one I was referring to. Having said that, the lakes at Mucking (which you refer to) would have formed part of that greater plan I envisaged because the whole of Thurrock was dotted with gravel, sand and clay pits. For the record, the one remaining pit at Mucking was severely hit by EE's 7-10 years ago, nicking and presumably eating every pike they caught. Are you able to bring me up to speed on the lake's status nowadays? I know Essex Wildlife Trust took it over but is fishing permitted?
 

Cliff Hatton

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 2, 2009
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
4
Location
Mid Wales
Alas we are more than likely going back to the future of the 1960s. Regulation and the agreements of fetters to stop such things happening are now days away from being lifted. Trump has already done it, how long before his clone follows suit?

'...now days from being lifted'? What's happening then, Bad one?
 

The bad one

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 8, 2008
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
2,114
Location
Manchester
Come Saturday morning all the regulations such as WFD, Bathing Water Directives, Habitats directives, are technically null and void, as they are EU regulations. And will start to be diluted and abandoned as the lobbyists get to work on this govt. "He who pays the piper..........."
And please don't tell us BoJo and his band has said they won't and you believe them Cliff!
 

mikench

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
27,412
Reaction score
17,772
Location
leafy cheshire
To provide legal continuity the Withdrawal Act enables the transposition of directly-applicable already-existing EU law into UK law, and so "create a new category of domestic law for the United Kingdom: retained EU law. This is my understanding so technically nothing will change on Saturday morning simply by effluxion of time.
 

Peter Jacobs

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 21, 2001
Messages
31,031
Reaction score
12,200
Location
In God's County: Wiltshire
To provide legal continuity the Withdrawal Act enables the transposition of directly-applicable already-existing EU law into UK law, and so "create a new category of domestic law for the United Kingdom: retained EU law. This is my understanding so technically nothing will change on Saturday morning simply by effluxion of time.


What Mike has said is correct, however, there are also clauses in the WA Act that allow government Ministers, of their own volition, to alter EU Regulations, Laws and Rules without recourse to Parliament.

It is all there to read if you take the time . . . .
 

The bad one

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 8, 2008
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
2,114
Location
Manchester
Indeed so Peter, and anybody who thinks that isn’t going tohappen over environmental regulations is being exceptionally naïve in my view.
 

steve2

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Messages
4,651
Reaction score
1,782
Location
Worcestershire
That's certainly in the same borough, Steve, but actually a different area to the one I was referring to. Having said that, the lakes at Mucking (which you refer to) would have formed part of that greater plan I envisaged because the whole of Thurrock was dotted with gravel, sand and clay pits. For the record, the one remaining pit at Mucking was severely hit by EE's 7-10 years ago, nicking and presumably eating every pike they caught. Are you able to bring me up to speed on the lake's status nowadays? I know Essex Wildlife Trust took it over but is fishing permitted?

The land I am talking about is east of Ockendon just goes to show how much infill as gone on over the years. The Essex wildlife trust don't mention fishing anywhere apart from at Dunton but that is leased to a syndicate. Belhus woods still have fishing that run by Essex parks.
 

mikench

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
27,412
Reaction score
17,772
Location
leafy cheshire
I'm guessing that's when something flows out. Like legal jargon, and other effluent. :)

Now now Kev as a master of English and it's wonderful vocabulary , I thought you might appreciate that a post dealing with legal matters ie EU regulations and their continued applicability after the end of the month, merited a response in legal vernacular.:)

When this phrase (effluxion of time) is used in leases, conveyances, and other like deeds, or in agreements expressed in simple writing, it indicates the conclusion or expiration of an agreed term of years specified in the deed or writing, such conclusion or expiration arising in the natural course of events, in contradistinction to the determination of the term by the acts of the parties or by some unexpected or unusual incident or other sudden event.

I hope that is clear.
 
Last edited:

nottskev

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 3, 2016
Messages
5,902
Reaction score
7,913
Now now Kev as a master of English and it's wonderful vocabulary , I thought you might appreciate that a post dealing with legal matters ie EU regulations and their continued applicability after the end of the month, merited a response in legal vernacular.:)

When this phrase is used in leases, conveyances, and other like deeds, or in agreements expressed in simple writing, it indicates the conclusion or expiration of an agreed term of years specified in the deed or writing, such conclusion or expiration arising in the natural course of events, in contradistinction to the determination of the term by the acts of the parties or by some unexpected or unusual incident or other sudden event.

I hope that is clear.


Allow me to offer you my heartfelt contrafibularity.

YouTube


Did you ever come across Chrissy Maher's (she was from Stockport, I believe) Plain English Campaign "Golden Bull" awards?
 
Top