Bob and Jane James Suspended from ACA

[GrahamM]

FISHINGmagic would appreciate it if comments on this news item are treated with great caution until the full story emerges.

[stu]

B....y hell ! Yup, must act with caution, after all it could be fingers in the till, drug abuse, sordid swinging parties......anything really!

[Ron Troversial Clay]

Let's just wait for the facts guys.

[Ken Tarleton 2]

Unfortunately,facts never interest the rumour mongers.

[GrahamM]

The only fact we have just yet is that they have been suspended from the ACA pending an investigation.

[stu]

.....and if they don't say what the investigation is about the rumours would definitely start.

[Peter (Tackle Tart) Jacobs]

Was this the "bombshell" that Richard Lee was alluding to last week?

Given that there are no facts available, then to caution against conjecture or potentially damaging rumour has to be the sensible advice.

[Nigel Connor(ACA ,SAA)]

Lets hope that the issue is resolved one way or the other without damaging the Association.

(It's not a result of Cheekeys letter, I hope!)

[Big Rik]

it might not be sordid at all, it could be that they're not doing a good enough job or anything 'normal'.
Just because they are high profile, why does it have to be something illicit?
(it might be, but it might not)

If you were underpeforming at work, you could be suspended pending an internal review.

[Ron Troversial Clay]

I have been involved in a few internal reviews regarding an individuals job performance during my work career Rik, (never about my own performance) but in good companies, these sort of things are kept confidential.

When an organisation makes a statement like the ACA have done, then something more is afoot.

But we must await the facts.