sam vimes
Well-known member
Sounds like the kind of place, and anglers, that I, and I suspect many others, if they're honest, would prefer to avoid like the plague. Whilst the removal of all the fish in the place may well alleviate some of the issues, I've got a sneaking suspicion that some current issues will remain, and they may just end up with some additional problems. Whilst I'm inclined to object to what the council proposes on principle, I'm not particularly comfortable in trying to defend the actions of the "anglers" concerned.
Shame if the fish are simply destroyed, but if they can't get a section 30 for them, what more can they really do?
Shame if the fish are simply destroyed, but if they can't get a section 30 for them, what more can they really do?