Hypothetical question.
Who owns the river?
Act1 scene 1
"You cannot fish here mate, your tresspassing and poaching, I can have the police here in 5mins" he said.
Is the owner the sole creator and maintainer of its coarse?
"Look, you have no licence, you havent produced a ticket for this stretch so Im asking you to leave".
Ok, fine..
I left. I was not on the land of a named man or his family, I did not kill or take and eat a fish either, I was unarmed and made no threat to use force. I was by myself.
Nothing could be established by witness testimony of 2 or more as it was his word against mine.
Who was it I caused offense to?
The gentleman (who never claimed owned where I was sat), The fishing club? I was not a member rightly so but no indication of a club, no signage and no proof I had seen any! The EU supreme court? The EU just want your time and effort to create a beast...they are not concerned with wetting a line unless at sea! The local authority? Any land the local authority has bought with money from people living in that borough/area of influence is that peoples to use right? Maybe the Government....they immunized the force in once taking of the area I sat at previously then, at some point in the past it was just a river, did I offend the Queen? Who is claiming direct ownership
Who actually owns a river? Who claims they can offer its use for a return? How did they acquire it? Was it lawful?
I would genuinely like to know.
Who owns the river?
Act1 scene 1
"You cannot fish here mate, your tresspassing and poaching, I can have the police here in 5mins" he said.
Is the owner the sole creator and maintainer of its coarse?
"Look, you have no licence, you havent produced a ticket for this stretch so Im asking you to leave".
Ok, fine..
I left. I was not on the land of a named man or his family, I did not kill or take and eat a fish either, I was unarmed and made no threat to use force. I was by myself.
Nothing could be established by witness testimony of 2 or more as it was his word against mine.
Who was it I caused offense to?
The gentleman (who never claimed owned where I was sat), The fishing club? I was not a member rightly so but no indication of a club, no signage and no proof I had seen any! The EU supreme court? The EU just want your time and effort to create a beast...they are not concerned with wetting a line unless at sea! The local authority? Any land the local authority has bought with money from people living in that borough/area of influence is that peoples to use right? Maybe the Government....they immunized the force in once taking of the area I sat at previously then, at some point in the past it was just a river, did I offend the Queen? Who is claiming direct ownership
Who actually owns a river? Who claims they can offer its use for a return? How did they acquire it? Was it lawful?
I would genuinely like to know.
Last edited: