33lb common

S

steve doyle

New member

Joined

Feb 1, 2003

Messages

0

Reaction score

0

• Sep 4, 2004

• #1

Hi all its been a while, as anyone fished at Fairlands Valley Park in Stevenage. Cos i had a 33lb common last Saturday.I got the photos back and it looks quite small. Is this a common thing with common carp.Im trying to sort out my scanner so you all can see it.Ill try and post it later

 

R

Richard Farrow

Senior Member

Joined

Mar 6, 2003

Messages

5,938

Reaction score

2

Location

Norfolk

• Sep 5, 2004

• #2

Congratulations Steve, look forward to seeing the photo.

 

T

The Monk

Guest

• Sep 5, 2004

• #3

still a good fish for Britain, well done mate

 

I

IanD

New member

Joined

Sep 4, 2004

Messages

0

Reaction score

0

• Sep 5, 2004

• #4

Steve,
Could be down to the camera angle etc. Sometimes does that to me. I had a very nice 21lb mirror the other week and the way the guy was standing over me as opposed to down low and right in front he made it look very inferior

 

B

Big Rik

Guest

• Sep 5, 2004

• #5

as long as you weighed it right and you know it was 33, then what difference does it make?



Unless of course you show us the photos and it looks 10lb, then we'll all call you a fekkin' liar.

 

S

steve doyle

New member

Joined

Feb 1, 2003

Messages

0

Reaction score

0

• Sep 5, 2004

• #6

Thanks chaps. Im still trying to sort out my crap scanner. Im sure you all wont be disapointed.

 

B

Big Rik

Guest

• Sep 5, 2004

• #7

get yourself a digi camera and throw the scanner at the retard that took your crap photo.

two birds, one stone etc etc

 

B

boz

New member

Joined

Aug 28, 2003

Messages

0

Reaction score

0

• Sep 6, 2004

• #8

Well done on your common mate.I always photograph both sides of the fish,sometimes they look bigger when held one way than the other.

 

E

ED (The ORIGINAL and REAL one)

Guest

• Sep 7, 2004

• #9

Surely you dont want them to look bigger you just want them to look what they are .....