Rik / Stu - let me expand on my KISS.
There are going to be people who have all levels of abilities and preferences, and therefore considering your audience, and the points you want to put across, is crucial.
For the first time for over a year I bought a copy of CF, which I have always considered the best of the "general" monthlies. However I stopped buying it for a number of reasons, and one was that some of the articles just became too complex for me and in fact seemed to be more aligned at proving how clever they were in coming up with the next variation etc etc.
Don?t get me wrong, for the dedicated, regular carper, these are fine, however for the more occasional carper (me) I think it confuses more than it helps. This is because I feel my "think time" is better spent on getting to grips with location, feed etc rather than trying to think through the complexities of these rigs and how they work. One day I no doubt will, but not yet.
So, what I would find really useful is a table. Down the side (rows) has various "conditions" e.g. deep silt, shallow silt, gravel, weedy etc. Then along the top other key factors e.g. bait used, feeding type (ie PVA, method, spod particles), fish density, how pressurised. These are my examples, you may have others that you think are more pertinent. Then, fill in the boxes in terms of what rigs you think are best.
What I do not want (personally) is technical detail or complexity, that can come later.
As an analogy, if I was taking up cricket I would not get a bowling machine set at 90 mph or go and face Shaob Aktar !! It?s a progression.
So, as Oscar said, if you want to include my type of audience, a reference point like this table I suggested would be really, really useful. Hope this helps.
See you Tuesday with my standard knotless hair rig !