Have you noticed that with most (natural) waters, the status quo is rarely maintained for very long? I'm talking about species, which species dominate, size etc. Very rarely does a water fish the same say 10 years down the line.
What are the reasons for this?
I know that some fish notably Perch, are cyclical. My understanding is that is mainly because of the Perch disease coming and going. I also understand how stocked fish i.e. in most cases Carp, can dominate to the detriment of species such as Tench. I'm really talking about natural waters though, where only nature does the stocking. I understand how Cormorants can decimate a certain size of fish, but as far as I'm aware they are not selective of species.
a good example of this is my local river. It used to be full of small/ medium Chub, alongside a few Trout. Nowadays Chub are extremely rare, i haven't caught one for 3 years. Trout are steady. There has been an explosion of Grayling, they are now the dominant species. Why should Grayling replace Chub? There are lots of Crayfish in the river.
How about your own experiences, and any thoughts why this happens?
What are the reasons for this?
I know that some fish notably Perch, are cyclical. My understanding is that is mainly because of the Perch disease coming and going. I also understand how stocked fish i.e. in most cases Carp, can dominate to the detriment of species such as Tench. I'm really talking about natural waters though, where only nature does the stocking. I understand how Cormorants can decimate a certain size of fish, but as far as I'm aware they are not selective of species.
a good example of this is my local river. It used to be full of small/ medium Chub, alongside a few Trout. Nowadays Chub are extremely rare, i haven't caught one for 3 years. Trout are steady. There has been an explosion of Grayling, they are now the dominant species. Why should Grayling replace Chub? There are lots of Crayfish in the river.
How about your own experiences, and any thoughts why this happens?