Dave's article is first-class... and proves beyond doubt that opinions on what to DO about line twist vary. I use Dave's method, and it has served me well.
There are some scientific principles at work here, as **** Walker once pointed out. When six coils of lie peel off a fixed spool, they impart precisely three turns of twist in the line... half a turn per coil. Sounds a lot, but oddly it doesn't seem to cause us any real problems when we're fishing. However, as this physical attribute is not dependent on spool diameter, it does make it plain that wide spools put less twist in line per metre than narrow spools - twice the circumference, half the twist.
I use Dave's method of loading line because I have noticed a tendency for some line to 'crinkle' while stored, or even have that appearence just after loading them on. With the Chilton method, each loop of line peeling off the 'mother' spool imparts a twist which the rotating bale arm quickly reverses, so while the line's on the spool, it's not twisted. Less crinkling.
I am the first to admit that the bloke who spools with the rotating mother spool, while imarting twists into the line on the reel spool, gets rid of them all when he casts out again!
The Dave Lane method is, I think, the half-way house, the mother spool partly rotating, partly coiling its line, so half the twists go on the spool in the first place, and half are on it when it's cast out.