RSPCA blunder

I

Ian Cloke

Guest
RSPCA blunder puts deadly predator into crayfish haven

No doubt it seemed the right thing to do at the time. When an RSPCA officer stumbled across a live crayfish in a suburban drain, he took it to an internationally recognised crayfish reserve. In fact, it was the worst thing he could have done. The crayfish is a vicious, red-clawed American predator that has almost wiped out the smaller, gentler native species since it was introduced to Britain 35 years ago.

And the Ensors Pool reserve, in a former quarry near Nuneaton, Warwickshire, is home to an important population of the endangered indigenous white-clawed crayfish.

The RSPCA has admitted that the officer made "a serious mistake". The society could face prosecution under the 1981 Wildlife and Countryside Act.

The American invader, which has large claws and an "armour-plated" body, and can be up to 12 inches long, routinely takes over the habitat of the native species and steals its food. It also carries a deadly fungus to which the indigenous crayfish has no resistance.

The American crayfish was introduced into England and Wales in the 1970s and bred on commercially to supply shops and restaurants.

But many farmers went bankrupt in the 1980s economic recession and abandoned their crayfish. The crustaceans spread to rivers and ponds all over Britain, wreaking havoc among the native species.

The amphibious crayfish can travel for months searching for new freshwater sites to colonise. It can devour plants, small invertebrates and fish eggs and wreck habitats. Anglers complain that the crayfish eat their bait and burrow into riverbanks, eventually causing them to collapse.

When the RSPCA realised its error - after seeing a photograph of the crayfish taken before it was put into the reserve - officers tried to find the American interloper, but without success.

The Countryside Alliance said it would report the society to the police and urge them to prosecute under the Wildlife and Countryside Act. "Nobody should be above the law," a spokesman for the alliance said. "This was a stupid thing to do, endangering a protected and significant population of indigenous crayfish."

The 1981 Act makes it an offence to release any non-native animal to the wild in Britain without a licence. Offenders can be prosecuted and fined.

An RSPCA spokesman said the release of an American crayfish into an international reserve for native species was "a serious but honest mistake".

"We have not managed to find it yet," the spokesman added. "But it looks like there has been no damage done, though obviously we cannot predict what might happen in the future."
Jill Grieve
Press Office
Countryside Alliance
0207 840 9220
07775 938792
www.countryside-alliance.org
 
J

Jeff (AKA Cheeky Monkey, Spud, Jay Dubya, Woody .

Guest
It's also an offence to move fish from one water to another without a section 30. Crayfish are a fish, aren't they?
 
J

John McLaren

Guest
No Jeff they are crustaceans. I suppose the one thing you can say is that at least the RSPCA have owned up but you would have thought that they would have a policy of checking these things out before taking action - no mention of disciplinary action against the inspector responsible!
 

captain carrott

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2003
Messages
12,698
Reaction score
4
it's not as if they are hard to tell apart.

one bluddi great big red thing, the other small and light coloured
 
J

Jeff (AKA Cheeky Monkey, Spud, Jay Dubya, Woody .

Guest
Agreed John, they are custaceans, but you would still need a licence from the EA to remove them from a water and are forbidden (under pain of death) from introducing them to another water.

Just shows that when these RSPCA inspectors ar trained, they know little about the watery environment. Out of their depth usually.
 

Neneman Nick

Well-known member
Joined
May 20, 2004
Messages
2,875
Reaction score
1
Location
On the road to rack & ruin !!!
i wouldnt be attall surprised if this ends up stinking of the "a rule for one and a rule for the others".
at the end of the day its gonna need someone or a group with enough financial clout etc...to keep pressing for a prosecution.personally i cant see it happening i`m afraid.
 

Sgt Bash

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 31, 2002
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
Pointless prosecuting them under an angling banner, because it will just be another nail in the coffin with angling relationships. They will only hunt down every incident that they can attribute to anglers and publicise it in a way to show us up in a bad light, like the recent swan shot case that has been aired on here recently.
 

Bryan Baron 2

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2002
Messages
4,460
Reaction score
1
Location
Lancashire
A honest mistake is no defence in law. Next time your in court try hat defence and see were it will get you. I thought the RSPCA were here to protect animals not put the eqivalent of a fox in a chicken house.
 
J

Jeff (AKA Cheeky Monkey, Spud, Jay Dubya, Woody .

Guest
This made me wonder what an RSPCA officer would do about one of us when we 'accidentally' stand on one that we've caught?


After all, you're not allowed to remove them, unless you have a licence, and you're not allowed to put them back. - Problem, but would we be charged with cruelty?
 
Top