Peter Bishop
New member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2006
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 0
Now I know what you are thinking, and maybe an inch does matter in some circumstances, but what about fishing?
Have just returned from a short session on a lake where a guy who had done well recently on the same swim told me about a deeper hole about four sections out where he caught.
Well, I spent 20 minutes carefully plumbing up and while the swim deepened from 3.5 ft in the margin to about 4.25ft at five metres out I could find no appreciable difference in the bottom, just one spot the area of tea plate ( a depression rather that a hole) that might have been maybe 25mm deeper.
Do you think that is enough to make a difference, doesn't seem significant enough to be a spot that food collects.
I think think this guy was just lucky to drop onto feeding fish on the day and now puts that down to the inch difference in the bottom at that spot. What do you think?
Have just returned from a short session on a lake where a guy who had done well recently on the same swim told me about a deeper hole about four sections out where he caught.
Well, I spent 20 minutes carefully plumbing up and while the swim deepened from 3.5 ft in the margin to about 4.25ft at five metres out I could find no appreciable difference in the bottom, just one spot the area of tea plate ( a depression rather that a hole) that might have been maybe 25mm deeper.
Do you think that is enough to make a difference, doesn't seem significant enough to be a spot that food collects.
I think think this guy was just lucky to drop onto feeding fish on the day and now puts that down to the inch difference in the bottom at that spot. What do you think?