Three local men fined for illegal fishing offences on the Teifi at Cardigan

I

Ian Cloke

Guest
At Cardigan Magistrates' Court this week (Tuesday 6 March) three local men were ordered to pay a total of ?900 in fines and costs after pleading guilty to illegal fishing offences committed on the River Teifi at Cardigan. The prosecutions were brought by Environment Agency Wales.

Emlyn James Rees of Williams Terrace, Cardigan and George Sommerville of Bay View, Parcllyn, Aberporth both pleaded guilty to two offences:

Placing an unauthorised fixed engine (a net) on the River Teifi upstream of Cardigan Town, an offence contrary to Section 6(1) of the Salmon & Freshwater Fisheries Act 1975 (as amended by Section 33(1) of the Salmon Act 1986).

Taking a migratory trout otherwise than by means of an instrument which they were entitled to use for that purpose by virtue of a fishing licence, an offence contrary to Section 27(a) of the Salmon & Freshwater Fisheries Act 1975.

Both men were ordered to pay fines of ?150 on each offence. A third man, Dean Adam Binding of Ivy Cottage, Talgarreg also pleaded guilty to the second offence. He was fined ?150 All three men were ordered to pay ?50 each in costs.

The Court was told that during the night and morning of 4/5 September 2006 two Enforcement Officers from Environment Agency Wales were conducting a routine patrol of the lower reaches of the River Teifi at Cardigan. They saw Rees and Summerville walking through the swimming pool car park carrying paddles. The two men were known to one of the officers who had previously seen them operating a canoe in the River Teifi. The Officers later saw the two men near the entrance to Cardigan Cottage Hospital where they appeared to be making their way to the nearby River Teifi.

The officers took up a fresh vantage point near an area known as the Holt. From here they saw an open, green, kayak-type canoe approximately 150 metres up stream. The actions of the two persons on board led the officers to believe that they were checking a net. As the canoe travelled downstream towards Cardigan it passed within 15 metres of the officers' position, enabling them to identify the occupants as Rees and Sommerville. The officers subsequently found a net, which had been set right across the river.

The following morning (6 September) as one of the officers was driving over Cardigan New Bridge, he saw the green canoe travelling downstream from the direction of the Holt. He made his way to the hospital grounds, where he saw it being landed on the hospital side of the New Town Bridge. On this occasion Rees and Summerville were accompanied by a third person, subsequently identified as Binding. They had in their possession a green army-style bag.

continues.......
 
I

Ian Cloke

Guest
As the three made their way across the town's swimming pool car park they were intercepted by the officer, the green bag was searched and found to contain a gill net and a quantity of fish. The three men declined an invitation to attend Cardigan Police Station in order that a formal taped interview could be conducted but did agree to be interviewed under caution at the scene.

During the course of those interviews Rees and Sommerville both admitted having set the net at approximately 1.15am on 5 September and having retrieved it with Binding at 9.15am on 6 September. Binding admitted his role in retrieving the net.

The Officer then took possession of the monofilament gill net, some 45 yards in length, which when sorted was found to contain four mullet, three bass, one flounder and a migratory trout. The net was retained by the Agency under the powers of the 1975 Act whilst the Court made an order of forfeiture in respect of the seized fish.

After the case an Agency spokesperson commented: "Our Fisheries Enforcement Officers will continue to patrol the river Teifi and other rivers in West Wales throughout the forthcoming angling season. Any evidence gained of illegal fisheries activity will lead to appropriate enforcement action. Migratory salmonid stocks are under enough pressure including loss of feeding grounds and netting at sea. The use of a set net to intercept adult fish on their return journey to their spawning grounds is a serious fisheries offence, recognised by the courts when sentencing, as in this case.'
 
Top