If you were the editor an angling publication what would it look like?

Lord Paul of Sheffield

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 26, 2004
Messages
17,971
Reaction score
194
Location
Furkum Hall, Sheffield

Personally I think the Angling Start has it about right. There is a mix of angling styles, match, specimen, river and still water.

And most of the contributors are ordinary anglers with no or little sponsorship

---------- Post added at 11:09 ---------- Previous post was at 09:45 ----------

so far 20 peopel ahve read this and not one reply:mad:
 

maceo

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
759
Reaction score
67
Location
West Oxfordshire
We don't get that down here - at least I've never seen it in the newsagents.

I'd really like to see a river dedicated fishing mag. Every other one seems to have the (often vast) majority of the articles dedicated to still water and carp fishing.
 

flightliner

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
7,594
Reaction score
2,761
Location
south yorkshire
Mi lud. I go along with what you say in the main-- its more interesting than most of the mainstream mags out there by a country mile (dont buy them at all these days)It does however depend on the guys out there sending in their contributions to Jim Baxter for him to publish in the first place and on occasion it shows that he struggles for content.
Take last year during the heavy snow for example, there were six articles on fishing local commercials thro the ice.
One maybe two would be ok but six was far too many, sometimes there are also too many reads on commercials which bore me stiff to be honest, and of late we are seeing the same back garden at the side of the same little river. Other occasions we read something but there is almost no angling content by the contributor-- just waffle . I have a simple test as to wether I,m going to buy it or not, I skim thro it at the newsagents and I have to see five articles that I want to read-- less and it stays on the shelf.
That said when its good its very good which -fortunately- is on balance, most of the time but there are times when it suffers somewhat.
 

Peter Jacobs

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 21, 2001
Messages
31,035
Reaction score
12,214
Location
In God's County: Wiltshire
Personally I think the Angling Start has it about right.

I've only ever seen one copy of this, and that was quite a few years ago, so my comments may not be applicable to more recent issues, however:

It seemed to be a parochial sort of publication with a limited distrubution area, so probably supportable only in a relatively small area.

I also think that the days of National Angling publications, (as well as many other hobby-related ones) are very much numbered in favour of Internet based communication.

But, what do you think . . . . . . ? LOL
 

geoffmaynard

Content Editor
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
3,999
Reaction score
6
Location
Thorpe Park
I would go for the format of the 1970 Angling magazine - imo the best fishing mag ever produced. But it would go broke because it's not specialised enough for the present UK market.
 

Peter Jacobs

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 21, 2001
Messages
31,035
Reaction score
12,214
Location
In God's County: Wiltshire
But it would go broke because it's not specialised enough for the present UK market.

Precisely!

That is why publications like the Angling Star are still around, they cater for a very local market and probably have a lot of subscription readers (guessing there)

These days fishing is sub-divided into so many individual and disrete sections that no one publication (maybe excluding Waterlog) will make money in such a restricted market place.

What would interest the traditional angler is hardly ever found in the weeklies or the monthlies, whereas neither would the avid Barbel angler find much to read in Waterlog . . . . . . . .
 

maceo

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
759
Reaction score
67
Location
West Oxfordshire
I'd also have a magazine without page after page of boring match results and half-hearted 'where to fish' spacefillers.

I'm sure the match results are interesting for the 50 or so people who get to see their name in (very small) print, but it's as dull as ditchwater for the rest of us to be honest.

Since the AT and AM print those results anyway, I'd not carry them and use the space for more articles that people might want to read and would be a bit more interesting.
 

dezza

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 14, 2000
Messages
32,331
Reaction score
7
Location
Rotherham South Yorkshire
That is why publications like the Angling Star are still around, they cater for a very local market and probably have a lot of subscription readers (guessing there)

These days fishing is sub-divided into so many individual and disrete sections that no one publication (maybe excluding Waterlog) will make money in such a restricted market place.

What would interest the traditional angler is hardly ever found in the weeklies or the monthlies, whereas neither would the avid Barbel angler find much to read in Waterlog . . . . . . . .
__________________

Angling Star which has a circuation of approx 11,000 is circulated in Yorkshire, Notts, Derbyshire, Lancs and parts of Lincs. It can be bought at supermarkets, newsagents, WH Smiths and some filling stations. It can also be obtained on subscription.

There are even some West Midlands towns where it can be found.

It contains very little advertising and lots of copy.
 

Keith M

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2002
Messages
6,193
Reaction score
5,086
Location
Hertfordshire
If I was an editor of a fishing magazine I would like it to look similar to the old 'Creel Magazine' or similar to the 'Waterlog' magazine.
 
Last edited:
Top