Float shotting question

qtaran111

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
118
Reaction score
2
Location
London
Evening all,

I was digging through some old stuff and found a float I've never used (Middy silverfish) marked 4 no.4:
IMG_5974-M.jpg


Being never used, I'd thought I'd see what it looks like with 4 no.4 attached:
IMG_5977-M.jpg


I know float markings aren't entirely accurate but this seems way off. Am I missing something here?

ps. yes, my other half is away at the moment and yes I've got too much time on my hands :w
 

daniel121

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
960
Reaction score
3
Lol get some work done :D;)

Seriously my main reason for making my own floats was because of inconsistencies with shop brought floats, nothing angers me more than spending my hard earned on 3 identical floats to find that all 3 are vastly different.

I'm told that things have got better now days but I use all my own floats so I wouldn't know. All I'll say is it does not surprise me too much qtarten111.
 

rubio

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2010
Messages
1,234
Reaction score
576
Location
Suffolk
Got a few of these and similar, eg squatt float. I like them for caster just over depth with that dome just held in the surface film.
As for shot loading I tend to ignore the info and stick on a large shot and work it out from there. A 'cut down' version of one of these with the broken tip replaced by a fine pole tip is currently rigged on my whip and ready to go at short notice.
 

Keith M

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2002
Messages
6,190
Reaction score
5,079
Location
Hertfordshire
Yes it certainly looks like the shotting marked on the float is way under its real shotting capacity.

Also; 0.6grm is more like 3No4 (not 4No4) so middy didn't even get that right LOL.

SplitShotConversionChart.gif


I have a few of these wagglers in my collection and they are actually not bad wagglers for slightly shorter ranges in 3 or 4BB sizes and upwards (in ideal weather conditions) , but don't rely on the shotting capacity marked on them; as you've found out already their marked shotting capacities are not very accurate LOL.

I also sometimes use them in their smaller sizes when I'm using a Whip.

Keith
 
Last edited:

john step

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
7,006
Reaction score
3,994
Location
There
Got a few of these and similar, eg squatt float. I like them for caster just over depth with that dome just held in the surface film.
As for shot loading I tend to ignore the info and stick on a large shot and work it out from there. A 'cut down' version of one of these with the broken tip replaced by a fine pole tip is currently rigged on my whip and ready to go at short notice.


I like the fine pole tip replacement bit. Try this. Glue a nylon bristle from a yard brush in a waggler top. Then the original part of the float can be dotted right down to a point at the water surface leaving a couple of inches if bristle showing that only takes a whisper to go under.
On a lot of places I fish a black tip shows best. Just use a coat of black nail varnish. It even comes with a brush.
 

qtaran111

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
118
Reaction score
2
Location
London
Thanks for the answers all.

The actual capacity is around 6 and a bit no 4, probably around 1.2 - 1.3g (or around 3BB).

I might give it a go at the weekend to see how it works out.
 
B

binka

Guest
I've got a few of those Middy Silverfish wagglers and found exactly the same, they are nice sensitive floats once you suss out the actual loading though.

I've found Premier floats to be outrageously inaccurate which is a shame as 1) they're nice, well made and durable floats and 2) I have rather a lot of them

I tend to go by sight these days as much as what is printed on the stem unless it's the Kamasan straight peacocks which are pretty accurate.
 

qtaran111

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
118
Reaction score
2
Location
London
I've got a few of those Middy Silverfish wagglers and found exactly the same, they are nice sensitive floats once you suss out the actual loading though.

I've found Premier floats to be outrageously inaccurate which is a shame as 1) they're nice, well made and durable floats and 2) I have rather a lot of them

I tend to go by sight these days as much as what is printed on the stem unless it's the Kamasan straight peacocks which are pretty accurate.

That's the thing, it "looks" like a nice float. As I was sorting out a bunch of old floats its stood out.

I was wondering about the premiers as I saw them pop up on one of the angling online stores. They look like exact copies of Dave Harrell's floats.
 

trotter2

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
1,645
Reaction score
59
Evening all,

I was digging through some old stuff and found a float I've never used (Middy silverfish) marked 4 no.4:
IMG_5974-M.jpg


Being never used, I'd thought I'd see what it looks like with 4 no.4 attached:
IMG_5977-M.jpg


I know float markings aren't entirely accurate but this seems way off. Am I missing something here?

ps. yes, my other half is away at the moment and yes I've got too much time on my hands :w

Put a big lump of meat on the hook and it will be perfect LOL
 
Top