I'm not involved in this and haven't complained to the mods. But from a personal perspective the guys who have issues with the way that the BS is being run proved their points some months ago and ever since have been undermining their own credibility.
I think that a lot of bystanders such as myself have seen enough to realise that the BS is not what it was and probably never can be. Time to move on.
Just my thoughts.
Mr Pix,
as you haven't been involved I am not sure you fully understand the issues, all I am asking is for < some obcure question about something long forgotten> to be answered and I know this for a fact because <I was at some meeting or other about 15 years ago > when <insert name of lonf ago banned member > did this thing that no one can remember <but that we are all convinced we remember perfectly >.
If the chosen one <insert name of person no one has heard of > and <another long ago banned member > plus < probably that guy with the blog > would just answer my question <they wont> then I would cease and desist all comments <I wont> on this so called society.
I for one <maybe 4 or 5 > couldn't care less <well shut up then > about the chosen one or <some obscure meeting in a pub> after all as we all know from facebook there were actually only 15 people there.
This is a fundamental issue of free speech < dont worry only another 4 or 5 paragraphs to go > and need I even reference the incident on the Wye ? < no idea what the incident was but I am mildly intrigued was it the one where they phoned someone up and pretended to be a fish > because that <incident on the Wye > just about says it all about <some other guy I have never heard of > and after all the hard work I have done < personally I usually skip these bits - you should too > .... teaching kids how to catch barbel.
Finally as the great philosepher once said < some dodgy looked up quote coming now poster will have orgasm just at the point he presses submit > then a man who has only fished once will be an angler of life