cg74
Well-known member
No waffle from me it was pretty clear to everybody else what I wrote, coz there's only you being pedantic about.
Safe rigs on a river I doubt you've ever fished and probably only see as you wizz past on the M6. You can't without losing plenty...it snags, it moves, and it does that alot on the Ribble, it dumps. Simple!!!!!! Lead deliberately left in the river. Oh dear we're back to whether that's acceptable or not? So is it?
As we are being pedantic the word Topography is incorrect to describe the course and character of a river, the actual correct terminology is Fluvial Morphology. So now you know, you can say what you mean and get it right in future can't you!
The geology is the rock base the river has cut down to over the millennia it's been in existence. All rivers will attempt to erode down to sea level, it's only the type of rock that stops it. And there are 3 classifications that all other rocks fit into Igneous, Metamorphic and Sedimentary. So no a rock is not a bleedin rock, it's one of the 3 types and that dictates its GEOLOGY.
---------- Post added at 01:40 ---------- Previous post was at 00:59 ----------
Philip I too remember the same report. So I've done some basic calculations based on the following.
An angler fishing the Ribble uses an average of lead weight of 2 oz
He loses on av 2 weights per session over the season = 4 oz
X that by 38 sessions = 1 a week over the whole season.
38 x 4 = 152 oz per season 152 / by 16 = 9.5 lbs per season. At bare minimum there are 50 anglers fishing the river on any one day at weekend, far more during the summer, less of course in the depths of winter. So 50 is a reasonable and realist figure taken over the whole season.
50 x 9.5 = 475 lb of pure lead lost by all anglers in a year.
That in my view is not an insignificant amount of lead lost per year.
Realistically that is an underestimation as many of the guys are doing far more sessions than 1 a week, some of the retired guys are on 3-5 days a week.
Sam question for you, "Are you still sure you are standing by your comment?"
You keep waffling on old boy, you seem to have convinced yourself you're right. You're correct in your guess that I've never fished the river Ribble though, so go on enlighten me as to what's so special/unique about the river Ribble, what seperates it so much from the three examples I gave of rivers that I deemed as having similar characteristics.
Does the water flow up hill, hmmm, no! Are the weed beds thicker and stronger than every other river, errrrr, no! Oh and just cos you like talking about stones, are they sharper than any other river, well I'll leave you to answer that one.
For the record topography is not an incorrect term to use when talking about a river, it may not be the best term but it is not incorrect!
Go read the definition for the word if you don't believe me.
And I wrote; "for the purpose of this debate a rock is a rock, and please don't bore me describing the differences between granite, flint or any other bleedin' stone types."
I should've added; unless the Ribbles rocks are sharper, which no doubt they are!
Last edited: