P
Paul Williams
Guest
Flicking through various sites and magazines this evening i came across one or two refrences or links to the various bodies within angling, i'm talking of two in particular, the ACA and the BRFC, another site requested the ACA acknowledge a donation that they made, nothing was forthcoming, when questioned about this those who "run" the ACA replied their pc was in a bit of a mess and they hoped to have it up and running for December.....aint we heard that one before on this site? at least a year ago??
The BRFC... Phil Smith(BRFC member) writes a very good article about the Linch hill roach in the second addition of a monthly (Don't know if i can name it!)now i don't want to raise the roach/hybrid thing again but requests to initiate a means of identifing species went totally unanswered, Phils catches are legendary and deserverdly so, but i feel uneasy that there seems to be a wall of silence to the requests to initiate a modern means of identifing a species.
So my question is are the majority of "angling bodies" nothing more than a variation of the old quangos? eg full of thier own importance but deaf to any constructive critism, or do they do a good job???
The BRFC... Phil Smith(BRFC member) writes a very good article about the Linch hill roach in the second addition of a monthly (Don't know if i can name it!)now i don't want to raise the roach/hybrid thing again but requests to initiate a means of identifing species went totally unanswered, Phils catches are legendary and deserverdly so, but i feel uneasy that there seems to be a wall of silence to the requests to initiate a modern means of identifing a species.
So my question is are the majority of "angling bodies" nothing more than a variation of the old quangos? eg full of thier own importance but deaf to any constructive critism, or do they do a good job???