Graham
I agree with your comments, apart from me missing the point. Have you considered the fact that because it was published on this site, that the FM referrals could have been a touch more subtle?
Perhaps I am being over critical, but I think the article would have been more valid, had the author been less motivated to mention the publication where it sat.
Only my opinion, of course. And as far as I am aware, free speech (within the confounds of normal accepted practice) is encouraged here?
After all, we would not expect, nor appreciate the editorial team censuring a member who disagreed with one of the advertisers, would we?
Apart from that, makes a change for maggot drowning, boilie hurling, or 32.4lb Barbel ;-)
Anyway, when are we going to get a spell checker on this? Save me from editing ...