Maceo, you are flattering your self if you think that I am holding any kind of a grudge against you. Your convoluted and often illogical arguments are nothing more than an occasional irritaition. You certainly do not mean enough to me for me to get upset about any criticisms you might have of my behaviour or preferences. Like most others here, I have more important concerns than the bleatings of an under achiever. However, when you brag about how you will endanger the lives of other road users because of your petty and irrational attitude, then I feel obliged to inform others of what you have said. After all, there is a possibility that others here might have to share the road with you and that they could be endangered by by your stupid actions simply because you don't like people who have personalised plates.
As to why those you call by the name on their plates get upset, I have no idea but I would suggest that you ask one of those you approach in that way just why they get upset. It seems to be pretty pointless in asking me because I do not have my name on my plates
To be honest, I can't remember what I said I'd do to personalised number plate cars - you'll have the remind me. How was I going to put road users' lives at risk? It doesn't sound like the sort of thing I'd do after 40 years on the road without an accident, claim or conviction of any type.
One thing I do with cars with personalised plates is not let them out if they're sitting at a junction. You couldn't get a fag paper between my old Astra and the car in front in those cases. They have to sit there and wait. That's not dangerous, it's just tilting the scales back in our direction a little bit. "Getting a bit of our own back" as we underclass/under achiever/benefits scrounger/terrorist sympathiser/poor people like to say.
As for the talk about letting people into my house (or my landlord's house to be more accurate) is of course absolute nonsense. We're not talking about people's private living space, we're talking about vast swathes of forests, beaches, rivers and countryside that are supposedly "owned" by someone.
I just don't see how you can "own" a beach or a forest or a river or a mountain. It's a god-made natural feature that belongs to everyone.
It's a good job you rich folk can't bottle up the air and put it in giant gasometers and declare it private and for your own use exclusively, because I'm sure you wouldn't hesitate.
And if poor people like us were to grab a sneaky lungful, I bet we'd be set upon and marched off to the police for "theft" of the private air.
To talk about "theft" when it comes to someone paddling their canoe down a river is similarly laughable. Theft is when I knock you over the head with some pool balls in a sock and steal your wallet. It's not when someone paddles or fishes in a supposedly private river. For me that's more a case of the dispossessed reclaiming what is their right by birth.