I think some of the remarks are unbelieveable in this thread with regard to actions of others in contravention of fishery law ( criminal law)
What canal produces uniform sized small carp in quantity?...... None that I can think of besides why weren't there any roach, perch, and othe more usuable livebaits in the bucket as well at the same time.
the phrase " Powers of deduction my dear Watson " comes to mind somehow !!
those that refer to big carp up to 30lb being affected totally miss the big picture in that all fish would be afflicted by disease in that location should an outbreak ocur from the introduction of illegally stocked fish including discarded livebaits after use which would then because of flow rates make its way to other connected waterways as for example the carp deaths in the Bridgwater canal area last year which remained unexplained for ages
The Offending anglers vehicle number should have been taken and reported immediately to the EA on the 0800 hotline as is the real fact of the matter as far as the original observer should have done at the time and as he's banned the bloke he should still report it to the EA who will take a " Statement of witness" and see if they can deal with it appropriately as the person is known! if not, how can he be banned I would ask?
As an interesting observation, it seems that in the Wolverhampton area the fact that small carp are well used for livebaits as was practised by well known anglers from that area who were caught last year... makes You wonder if the carplings were from the same source ??? maybe the EA will get to the bottom of it if they get the correct information to work with
the incident yet again gives specimen pike anglers a bad name and yet again more fodder for the anti's
When will the angling bodies develope and implement a policy of " Name & Shame" offenders one wonders and clean the sport up !
As old Meldrew would say..... " I can't believe it!"