Merv, thanks for the extract from the flyforum, I had previously tried to view it on the website without success.
I think some of thecritics of Richard Walker are nit pickers. Yes, he could be dogmatic on occasions, yet he had an original viewpoint and used his engineering and scientificexperience to improve angling techniques and equipment. And I also thought his biography, by Barrie Rickards,was a fair portrayal of a great innovator.
His articles and books were written with clarity and humour, and they are still worth reading today, over twenty years after his death.
I notice Malcom Greenhalgh (hope the spelling is right) asked a few anglers fishing if the had heard of **** Walker, and none had. Oddly enough, Walker's biographer, Barrie Rickards wrote on this website that he did a similar survey, and found that very few anglers had heard of Walker.
I thinkthis indicates that Walker's innovations and influence have been absorbed so fully into modern angling, that relative newcomers to the sport don't realise he was the instigator - for example, the Arlesey bomb, carp techniques (bite alarms, free lining, triangular landing nets), carbon fibre rods, improved design of fixed spool reels, fly design.