nicepix
Well-known member
Sometimes shaun baiting up is a complete waste of time , not particularly when bream fishing but on rivers theres often no need whatsoever, just for once(on account of this thread) i,ll say-- I once had 33 barbel from one tin of spam with a 15-5 best being the last fish of the day- all they saw from me was the hookbait.
Another time i had three short five hour sessions and took 34 BIG barbel totalling just short of 350 lbs on less than a pint and a half of maggots- in short i'd found the "nest" so to speak- the holy grail of an anglers dream. Baiting had very little to do with the results. Maybe other anglers failure where the second catch of barbel was concerned to see that a static bait was a danger on account of angling pressure,but a moving one-- little if never seen-- or used- was the way to go.
Maybe a good topic to expand on. ???
I think that this may be a common scenario; barbel feeding in a certain area on ascending nymphs or a hatch of crawlers and are seduced by an angler's bait. Same with trout or grayling fishing; I've had several dozen grayling on the fly letting nature take care of the baiting program. Similarly with roach being attracted into an area to feed on ascending nymphs and being persuaded to take a hookbait of maggot or caster.
What intrigues me though is when you can't see what is in front of you. No signs of fish at all. How do you decide what and when to feed if you haven't got a hook in the water to be able to watch for bites?