Genesis Part II – Is Man the New God?

“And on the eighth day man sent God on holiday and in his absence, for (His own) amusement and profit, man created fish in his own likeness: fat, stupid, greedy and riddled with disease.” Genesis part II 1:1.

We cannot help but play the role of God when it comes down to the species of flora and fauna that inhabit this world and it is a dangerous game that we play. Not satisfied with what we have we always seem to be striving for that extra little something.

Keep off the F1
Keep off the F1’s!

The world is an amazing place, full of beauty, and we as the anglers of the British Isles especially should count ourselves lucky that we have such a wonderfully rich, natural heritage that we as its occupants can be quite rightly proud of and enjoy. From the deep cold northern lakes which were scoured out by the last ice age, full of strange and endangered species such as Char and Pollen to the powerful rivers such as the Severn, Thames and Trent. We have many species of fish that cater for the wide church that is ‘angling’. Old men dressed in somber tweeds can cast a fly onto the nose of a fresh run salmon and pay a small fortune to do so; young children dressed in football kits can dangle a broken worm into a stream or park pond and catch a procession of small perch for next to nothing.

Angling is a unique sport in so much as it has the ability to be everything to every man. And you may wonder where I am going with this train of thought.

It was once said by a wise man that if he were to die and find himself in a small and pretty cottage with a perfect chalk stream running at its boundary and every cast he made, regardless of bait, he caught a double figure Brown trout he would instantly know that he had not lived his life as a good Christian because that would surely be hell that he was occupying.

Do we really want to catch a double figure fish with every cast? Do we want every cast to catch another fish identical to the last, the next fish the same as the first and so on and so on ad infintum? I certainly do not, because it really would be hell. I would soon tire of the brainless monotonous drudgery that would be masquerading as the sport I love. Fishing, for me and it seems many others like myself, is more than just about catching fish. Yes, you read that right, it isn’t all about catching fish; there are times when the catching of fish is simply a bonus.

“Seeing the wickedness of man’s plans God put down his Martini and from his holiday home in the Maldives sent forth one of his angels with a full keg of whup-ass.”

Why do I fish then if it is not to catch fish? I do fish to catch fish and that is my problem, I do not as a rule fish to catch something that is soiled. My fish, fish that I target, were not made by man; they have a genealogy that stretches back millions of years, a pure gene pool perfected product.

That is why I find myself taking issue with the plans to flood the country’s fisheries with a new strain of carp called the F2. Not satisfied with the F1, which is a pastie-sized carp much prized for its ability to withstand repeated capture. Their creator Simon Hughes of Riverfield fish farm in Kent has developed an all female sterile strain of carp that is capable of reaching 10lb in two years.

Is this the way forward? For what my opinion is worth I would have to say not, this has the potential to be a catastrophic genetic and ecological biological time bomb. A time bomb that is being fuelled by the lucrative market in waters that are capable of producing ever larger match weights and ever larger specimens.

We anglers seem to be shackled with individuals whose main – and sometimes only – consideration is profit. The F2 strain of KHV resistant triploid carp may on the outside look to be a fantastic breakthrough, guaranteeing the commercial match, specimen and pleasure fisherman the opportunity to consistently ‘bag-up’ on fast growing, hard fighting, all female, carp. But as our natural waterways continue to be placed under ever increasing pressure from the needs of our rising population it will be to these stillwaters that we will need to look to in the not so distant future as the last bastions and safeguards of our sport.

The F2 variety of fish will unfairly compete with the indigenous fish of our waterways, placing unwanted and unnecessary pressure on the bio-diversity of our fisheries before they die of old age. They will then have to be re-stocked, perpetuating a vicious circle of artificial stocking levels and non-sustainable and genetically corrupted fish. The EA should seek new legislation to promote the stocking of only genetically sound indigenous fish species such as roach, rudd, crucian carp and so forth. There is no room for oddities such as F1’s, F2’s, brown Goldfish and exotics such as wels catfish, sterlets and sturgeon.

“And out of the pool came floating a pale fish, his name was Death and all Hell followed closely behind him.” Revelations part II.

So rather than being a win-win new Genesis of the match and specialist angling scene whereby anglers are faced with the challenge of catching ever larger and more varied species, we could be facing fishery wipe outs of biblical proportions; something more akin to the apocalypse than fishing heaven. The only winners I can see in this situation are the people who own the fish farms. They will reap the financial benefits of repeated stocking regimes. I would implore the fishery owners to look at applying pressure onto the fish farmers with support from the press to try and alter the current situation we are now facing whereby we lose our bio-diversity and genetic validity before it is too late.

Am I alone in having these fears? It would seem not!

Here are some of the opinions of my fishing friends from the length a breadth of the country. They are in no doubts that this plan is flawed and leaves all of angling open to unwarranted and unnecessary dangers.

Ruth Lockwood
ECHO/SAA
‘IN UNITY LIES STRENGTH’

“I have personally volunteered a great deal of time, alongside many others, including the SAA and FACT, over the last 3 years, researching the threat of Koi Herpes Virus to UK carp stocks, on behalf of the English Carp Heritage Organisation (ECHO). I believe the EA may well be in a rock and a hard place on F2’s. Things are always more complicated than they look to most. I do not wish to damage the very supportive relationship with the EA at this point, however would like to stress that ECHO still has not received any information pertaining to the source of the science that supported their decision to allow movement consents for F2’s. Who compiled this science? Has the science been endorsed by UK experts? What is the country of origin of the F2’s? ECHO is working hard to achieve some answers, and will not be drawn to comment any further directly until they have. KHV is a very serious disease. Luckily we do not have it much here, and there are procedures in place to guard that situation to an extent. The reality, importing carp from countries where KHV is endemic, for instance, may be too much to bear for those current safeguards to be of any significance” The slightest risk posed to alter this already fragile situation appears nonsensical to ECHO, and I suspect you too!

Phil Smith
Specimen hunter, author and angling journalist

“I am not up on the carp scene, as they have no interest to me. My thoughts would be that it seems a little like introducing GM modified crops into the wild without knowledge of the possible repercussions. As far as I am aware there would be no reason not to accept a fish should it reach record weight. That said many of the fast growing strains lose the top end of their potential as part of the trade off for their stronger growth.”

Andy Nellist
Drennan cup Winner and all-round specialist

“I can’t think of any reason for introducing sterile fast growing carp other than to satisfy anglers on commercial fisheries who don’t give a hoot for the circumstances in which their quarry live. I’ve fished a couple of times on over stocked commercial fisheries and they were horrible places. I caught tons of fish but took no pleasure in doing so. It was so completely artificial.

Mark Wintle
Respected angler and angling writer

“Can you imagine the uproar if I bred a new type of cross bred bird; a cross between a sparrowhawk and a goose that was massive, aggressive, and went around killing all the other geese, swans, ducks, coots, moorhens….? It would be stopped instantly, yet the EA sits on the fence yet again allowing a fish that could cause the further decline of crucian stocks, with no real knowledge of the long-term effects.”

Baz Fleming
Pleasure Angler and head bailiff for FishingMagic

“Even when fish have had tests done on them, there is no guarantee that they are 100% clear of any disease or parasite. Even then, if dead or dying fish are found, it has to be proved that the disease came from this stock of fish. But as some diseases are not recognised or notifiable, this leaves the angling world in a very precarious position.”

Phil Hackett
Respected Northwestern specialist angler

“F2 hybrids or for that matter, any hybrids of any species of flora or fauna, should not be released into the environment unless they have been thoroughly tested in all potential scenarios, under biohazard conditions, by truly independent research testing, paid for by the creators of such hybrids. In environmental terms we have now an established principle, known as the ‘Precautionary Principle.’ Sadly, this principle seems to be forgotten when it relates to freshwater fish introductions. That to me, and I think most contributors to this discussion, is unacceptable and dare I say a failure on the part of the people charged with, and who we pay, for looking after the aquatic environment, ie, the Environment Agency!”

Andy Renton DVSG
(Ex match turned proper angler)

“I think it’s about time something was done. There are enough stagnant overstocked puddles full of damaged mouthed F1’s without introducing the F2. I’m not against anybody wanting to catch fish, but I think it’s taking the skill out of angling and lining the pockets of greedy fish farmers who don’t care about the long term effects it will cause to angling and our native species.”

Michael Townsend DVSG
(Specimen angler)

“The stocking of F2 fish is not bad….It’s shocking! The amount of carp being stocked in this country is bad but F1s are shocking and are a threat to crucians and should not have been created. F2s are simply taking the Mickey. The only people to benefit from this will be Mr Fish Farmer who seems to have the EA in his back pocket and the lake owners who want numpties who are incapable of catching natural wild fish”.

Tim Ridge DVSG
All-round specialist angler

“In theory I’m no more against them than I am any non-indigenous species and that includes carp, zander, catfish, sturgeon, ide, orfe, and daft ornamentals. The bones which I’d like to bring into contention are the stocking of any species (into already established fisheries) that aren’t indigenous, ie, nature didn’t intend them to be there. I also dislike it when any species is introduced at levels which an established fishery and its existing species cannot naturally sustain. Frankly I think we would have much better specimen fisheries in our part of the country if it weren’t for the fact that carp introductions are made in totally ridiculous levels. The fantastic tench fishing that was available at Drax was ruined because the controlling club and its anglers were not happy with a few carp. They saturated the place with them. Look at the facts, Johnson’s and Bawburgh have approximately two carp per acre, Papercourt, Toll pits, St Ives, less than one carp per acre. Wraysbury, Fishers Green, Broadwater, etc, etc, etc. etc, etc, much fewer than this! The motorway pond – hundreds, 3 Lakes – hundreds. This trend reoccurs throughout the area”